Just another WordPress.com site

The US is A Corporation!

leave a comment »

Winston Churchill,

speaking to his fellow countrymen

who did not want to get involved in the wars

Germany was starting in Poland and Czechoslovakia, said:

“Still, if you will not fight for the right

when you can easily win without bloodshed,

if you will not fight when your victory can be sure

and not too costly,

You may come to a moment when you have to fight

with all the odds against you,

while having only a precarious chance to survive.


You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory,

and will be better to perish than to live in slavery.”

Dear Bishop,

In January 1987, the First Presidency of the Church issued the following

message to be read in Sacrament Meeting:

“We should, in the tradition of the Founding Fathers, learn the principles of the

Constitution and abide by its precepts. We encourage Latter-Day Saints

throughout the nation to familiarize themselves with the Constitution. They

should focus attention on it by reading it and studying it. They should recommit

themselves to its principles and be prepared to defend it and the freedom it

provides. Citizens of this nation are free to participate in efforts designed to

WARN of the THREAT of any force or power, theory or principle that would deprive

them of their freedom or the individual liberties vouchsafed by the Constitution.

Because some Americans have not kept faith with our Founding Fathers, the

Constitution faces severe challenges. Those who do not prize individual freedom

are trying to erode its great principles. We, as Latter-Day Saints MUST BE

VIGILANT in doing our part to preserve the Constitution and safeguard the way of

life it makes possible. Learn more about this divinely inspired charter of our

liberty, speak in its defense, and preserve and protect it against evil or

DESTRUCTION. We encourage your participation and involvement in this worthy


In Priesthood session of Conference, April 1966, President David O. McKay

issued the following statement:

Page 1


“In order that there may be no misunderstandings by bishops, stake presidents and

others regarding members of the Church participating in non-church meetings to

study and become informed on the Constitution of the United States… Church

members are at perfect liberty to act according to their own consciences in the

matter of safeguarding our way of life… They are free to participate in

non-church meetings that are held to warn people… We therefore commend and

encourage every person and every group who is sincerely seeking to study

Constitutional principles and awaken a sleeping and apathetic people to the

alarming conditions that are rapidly advancing about us.

We wish all of our citizens throughout the land were participating in some type

of organized self-education in order that they could better appreciate what is

happening and know what they can do about it. Supporting…various organizations

that are attempting to awaken the people through educational means is a policy we

warmly endorse for all our people.”

In the last few years of the sixth millennium we find ourselves in a dangerous

condition. The enemies of righteousness and truth are found everywhere, but no

one seems to know how to overcome them. We find ourselves trying to survive the

onslaught of the devil and his advocates without the resources to combat them.

We read the newspapers, magazines and books, listen to the radio and watch the

television. All of these information instruments are full of evil, lying and

distortion. Where do we turn for the information, which we need?

Not only are we taught to study the four standard works, which contain the words

of Christ, but we are also taught to study other sources as well so that we may

understand the world in which we live.

Jesus said: And I give unto you a COMMANDMENT that you shall teach one another the doctrine of the kingdom. Teach ye diligently and my grace shall attend you, that you may be instructed more perfectly in theory, in principle, in doctrine, in the law of

the gospel, in all things that pertain unto the Kingdom of God, that are

expedient for you to understand. Of things both in heaven and in the earth, and

under the earth; things which have been, things which are, things which must

shortly come to pass; things which are abroad; the wars and the perplexities of

the nations, and the judgments which are on the land; and a knowledge also of

countries and of kingdoms.

Not only are we COMMANDED to feast upon the words of Christ and LIVE BY

EVERY WORD WHICH PROCEEDETH FROM THE MOUTH OF GOD, but we are commanded to study the things of this world, which will help us, understand and defeat the enemy. The enemy, of course, is the devil and those [Gadianton Robbers] who follow him.

This Scripture is the curriculum, which will enable us to defeat them.

Certainly, without any doubt, the most important message of the BOOK OF

MORMON is that Jesus Christ is the Savior and Redeemer of the world — that

without his suffering, death and resurrection none of us could be resurrected or


At this late date in the terrestrial history of the world, we are faced

with a problem which none of us can ignore, except at his or her own peril.

There is a COMMANDMENT in the BOOK OF MORMON, which I consider next in

importance, right now, to its testimony of Jesus Christ.

The COMMANDMENT is found in the book of Ether, Chapter 8.

Page 2


Moroni, after the destruction of the Nephites, translated the Book of

Ether from the Jaredites. In it he tells how Jared and his daughter created a

secret combination to overthrow Jared’s father, the king. After writing about

this event Moroni goes on to say:

“And it came to pass that they formed a secret combination, even as they of old,

which combination is most abominable and wicked above all, in the sight of God;

for the Lord worketh not in secret combinations, neither doth he will that man

should shed blood, but in all things hath forbidden it, from the beginning of


And now I, Moroni, do not write the manner of their oaths and combinations, for

it hath been made known unto me that they are had among all people, and they are

had among the Lamanites. And they have caused the destruction of this people of

whom I am now speaking, and also the destruction of the people of Nephi. And

whatsoever nation shall uphold such secret combinations, to get power and gain,

until they shall spread over the nation, behold, they shall be destroyed; for the

Lord will not suffer that the blood of his saints, which shall be shed by them,

shall always cry unto him from the ground for vengeance upon them and yet he

avenge them not. Wherefore, O ye Gentiles, it is wisdom in God that these things

should be shown unto you, that thereby ye may repent of your sins, and suffer not

that these murderous combinations shall get above you, which are built up to get

power and gain — and the work, yea even the work of destruction come upon you,


even the sword of justice of the Eternal God shall fall upon you to your

overthrow and destruction if ye shall suffer these things to be. Therefore, the

Lord commandeth you, when ye shall see these things come among you that ye shall

awake to a sense of your awful situation, because of this secret combination

which shall be among you; or woe be unto it, because of the blood of them who

have been slain; for they cry from the dust for vengeance upon it, and also upon

those who build it up. For it cometh to pass that whoso buildeth it up seeketh

to overthrow the freedom of all lands, nations, and countries; and it bringeth to

pass the destruction of all people, for it is built up by the devil, who is the

father of all lies; even that same liar who beguiled our first parents, yea, even

that same liar who hath caused man to commit murder from the beginning; who hath

hardened the hearts of men that they have murdered the prophets, and stoned them,

and cast them out from the beginning. Wherefore, I, Moroni, am commanded to write

these things that evil may be done away, and that the time may come that Satan

may have no power upon the hearts of the children of men, but that they may come

unto the fountain of all righteousness and be saved.’ [my emphasis]

Over the years I have talked to many members of the Church and almost all

of them have been totally ignorant of this COMMANDMENT in the Book of Mormon. As

I read the above scripture, a part of the Standard Works, you and I are

commanded, as Gentiles, to stop these secret combinations, which are now among

us, or:




Secret Combinations are run by Satan himself, and they are his way of

exercising force over men and attempting to thwart the Father’s plan of free

agency. The major focus of secret combinations is to control governments.

Governments are the most powerful means of fulfilling Satan’s plan, which

includes, 1) keeping men from worshipping Heavenly Father, 2) taking away free

agency, and 3) ruling with blood and horror on earth. As the Apostle Paul said:

“Put on the whole armor of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of

the devil. For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against

principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world,

against spiritual wickedness in high places.”

Christ’s church has its ordinances, while Satan’s church has its own rites and

Page 3


oaths. Satan’s church, however, is secret. It is called secret combinations or

secret societies, and much of its power is derived from its secrecy.

The members of Satan’s church make oaths and covenants, which they promise to

keep secret. This is explained in the Book of Moses. Satan’s church works the

same way today. Through history Satan’s secret combinations have destroyed almost

all civilizations; they destroyed them by taking over free governments and

turning them into governments of force and slavery. Of course, Satan does not

limit his attack to governments — he does everything he can to cause sin and

destroy faith — but his major source of power is governments that are controlled

by secret combinations.

It fulfills Satan’s original plan, but instead of forcing everyone to be good it

forces them to worship Satan and kills them if they worship God.

This message is in the Book of Mormon because it applies to us NOW!

Otherwise, it would not be there. We, as members of the Church, are the people

to whom this message is addressed. After all, Moroni is not talking to those who

are not members of the Church, and who do not accept the Book of Mormon as


In Nephite times the secret combinations were created by Kishkumen and

Gadianton, and came to be known as the Gadianton Robbers. It is extremely

important that we know where to find these people in our day, if we are to defeat

them. Every time we find the Gadianton robbers in Nephrites times, or the secret

combinations in Jeredite times, they are in one of two conditions. They are

either in control of the government or they are seeking control of the

defensement so they can turn it into a government.

From this beginning these secret combinations have been handed down from

generation to generation and have existed in almost all countries and kingdoms.

Before Alma turned over the twenty-four plates of Ether to his son Helaman he

gives him a commandment that he:

“…retain all their oaths, and their covenants, and their agreements in their


abominations; yea, and all their signs and wonders ye shall keep from this

people, lest peradventure they should fall into darkness also and be destroyed.

Therefore, ye shall keep these secret plans of their oaths and their covenants

from this people, and only their wickedness and their murders and their

abominations shall ye make known unto them; and ye shall teach them to abhor such

wickedness and abominations and murders; and ye shall also teach them that these

people were destroyed on account of their wickedness and abominations and their


He also informs him that:

“…there is a curse upon all this land, that destruction shall come upon all those

workers of darkness, according to the power of God…except they repent before they

are fully ripe.”

Alma also gives us insight as to some of their methods that we should be

looking for. In his desire to take over the government, Amalickiah gets himself

appointed “…second leader to the Chief Leader” of the Army of the Lamanites. He

then has his servants slowly poison the Chief Leader, Lehonti, so that he can

move into the position of Chief Leader of the Army of the Lamanites. On his away

to take over the kingdom, he uses a tactic that is still in common use today. He

has his servants kill the King, and used the King’s servants as SCAPEGOATS.

After making a showing of attempting to pursue this diversion, “…Amalickiah, by

his fraud, won the hearts of the people.”

Page 4


He then finished the work of taking the Kingdom by taking the King’s woman and

thereby exercising one of the oldest of Mafia rules.

In modern times we have seen the use of SCAPEGOATS in the Lincoln and

Kennedy assassinations, the Oklahoma City bombing and the 911 Events. And,

although the technology used today is more sophisticated, they still employ the

same methods, and get the same results. Technology seems to mystify the masses so

that it makes it easier to defraud them, and thereby win their hearts. Sadly, it

seems that intelligent people can’t discern that you CANNOT set aside the laws of

physics, just because you own and control the media.

Because they are among us today, Moroni issued the COMMANDMENT in Ether Chapter 8

to us so that we would be able to overcome or destroy them. When a commandment

is issued by the Lord, there is a guide, which we should follow. It was given to

us by Nephi, the son of Lehi:

And it came to pass that I, Nephi, said unto my father: I will go and do the

things which the Lord hath commanded for I know that the Lord giveth no

commandments unto the children of men save he shall prepare a way for them that

they may accomplish the thing which he commandeth them.

His desire for us to follow his commandments is stated in the Doctrine

and Covenants as follows:

Be diligent in keeping all my commandments, lest judgments come upon you, and

your faith fail you, and your enemy’s triumph over you. So, no more at present.

Amen and Amen.

Even though the Lord “shall prepare a way” for us to accomplish the thing

which he commandeth, he has not promised us that the way will be easy. President

Ezra Taft Benson wrote:

“Satan is anxious to neutralize the inspired counsel of the Prophet and hence

keep the priesthood off balance, ineffective and inert in the fight for freedom.

He does this through diverse means, including the use of perverse reasoning. For

example, he will argue, ‘There is no need to get involved in the fight for

freedom — all you need to do is live the gospel.’ Of course, this is a

contradiction, because we cannot fully live the gospel and not be involved in the

fight for freedom. A man must not only stand for the right principles, but he

must fight for them. And let me at this time salute those valiant patriots who

have banded together in well-structured organizations with an intelligent

program, and who are courageously acting to preserve and to restore and safeguard

our inspired Constitution. They can be proud of the friends they’ve gained and

the enemies they’ve earned.” [my emphasis]

He also wrote:

“Do not think the members of the Church shall escape! The Lord has assured us

that the Church will still be here when he comes again.

But has the Lord assured us that we can avoid fighting for freedom, and still

escape unscathed both temporally and spiritually? We could not escape the

eternal consequences of our pre-existent position on freedom. What makes us

think we can escape it here?”

In the November, 1987 issue of The Ensign, page 7, President Benson in

his conference talk “Our Devine Constitution” asked us:

“Are we reading the Constitution? Are we aware of its principles? Are we

abiding by its principles and teaching them to others? Could we defend the

Constitution? Can we recognize when a law is Constitutionally unsound? Do we

know what the prophets have said about the Constitution and the threats to it?”

When he asked about the Constitution he did not ask if your lawyer knew,

or your Bishop knew, or your Stake President knew, or your parents or your spouse

knew, he asked if YOU knew. And, that includes whether or not you know what your

individual responsibilities under the Constitution are. Those who do not

Page 5


understand the Lord’s law make themselves subject to Satan’s law.

The Founding Fathers shared the understanding of our Latter-day Prophets

in their recipe for successful government, and expressed it in their public


James Adams:

“Our Constitution was made only for a religious and moral people. It is wholly

inadequate for the government of any other.”

James Madison, the primary author of the Constitution of the United

States, said this:

“We have staked the whole future of all our political

constitutions upon the capacity of each of ourselves to govern ourselves

according to the moral principles of the Ten Commandments.”

There are six hundred sixty-four laws in the Bible. The Ten Commandments

are the summary of them.

Benjamin Franklin:

“Man will ultimately be governed by GOD or by tyrants.”

George Washington:

“The people know it is impossible to rightly govern without GOD and the BIBLE.”

Andrew Jackson:

“The BIBLE is the rock on which our Republic rests.”

On the 3rd of July 1776, John Adams, wrote a letter to his wife back in Boston.

“I am apt to believe,” he said describing the ‘grand event,’ the

signing of the Declaration of Independence from Great Britain, “that it will be

celebrated by succeeding generations as the great anniversary festival…

“It ought to be solemnized with pomp and parade, with shows,

games, sports, guns, bells, bonfires, and illuminations, from one end of this

continent to the other, from this time forward. for evermore.”

P.S. “You will think me transported by enthusiasm,” John Adams

continued in his letter of July 3rd, 1776, “but I am not.”

“I am well aware of the toil, and blood, and treasure that it

will cost us to maintain this declaration and support and defend these states.

Yet, through all the gloom, I can see the rays of ravishing light and glory. I

can see that the end is more than worth all the means, and that posterity will


Patrick Henry, who is called the firebrand of the American Revolution, is

still remembered for his words, “Give me liberty or give me death”; but in

current textbooks, the context of these words is omitted. Here is what he

actually said:

“An appeal to arms and the God of hosts is all that is left us.

But we shall not fight our battle alone. There is a just God that presides over

the destinies of nations. The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone. Is life so

dear or peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?

Page 6


Forbid it Almighty God. I know not what course others may take, but as for me,

give me liberty, or give me death.”

These sentences have been erased from our textbooks. Was Patrick Henry a

Christian? The following year, 1776, he wrote this:

“It cannot be emphasized too strongly or too often that this

great Nation was founded not by religionists, but by Christians; not on

religions, but on the Gospel of Jesus Christ. For that reason alone, people of

other faiths have been afforded freedom of worship here.”

Consider these words that Thomas Jefferson wrote in the front of his

well-worn Bible:

“I am a real Christian, that is to say, a disciple of the

doctrines of Jesus. I have little doubt that our whole country will soon be

rallied to the unity of our creator.” He was also the chairman of the American

Bible Society, which he considered his highest and most important role.

On July 4, 1821, President Adams said:

“The highest glory of the American Revolution was this: “It

connected in one indissoluble bond the principles of civil government with the

principles of Christianity.”

Calvin Coolidge, our 30th President of the United States reaffirmed this

truth when he wrote,

“The foundations of our society and our government rest so much

on the teachings of the Bible that it would be difficult to support them if faith

in these teachings would cease to be practically universal in our country.”

In 1782, the United States’ Congress voted this resolution:

“The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the

Holy Bible for use in all schools.”

History has shown us that these men honored their word with their

actions. Immediately after creating the Declaration of Independence, the

Continental Congress voted to purchase and import 20,000 copies of Scripture for

the people of this nation.

William Holmes McGuffey is the author of the McGuffey Reader, which was

used for over 100 years in our public schools, with over 125 million copies sold,

until it was stopped in 1963. President Lincoln called him the “Schoolmaster of

the Nation.” Listen to these words of Mr. McGuffey:

“The Christian religion is the religion of our country. From it

are derived our nation, on the character of God, on the great moral Governor of

the universe. On its doctrines are founded the peculiarities of our free

Institutions. From no source has the author drawn more conspicuously than from

the sacred Scriptures. For all these extracts from the Bible, I make no apology.”

Of the first 108 universities founded in America, 106 were distinctly

Christian, including the first, Harvard University, chartered in 1636. In the

original Harvard Student Handbook, rule number 1 was that students seeking

entrance must know Latin and Greek so that they could study the Scriptures:

“Let every student be plainly instructed and earnestly pressed to

consider well, the main end of his life and studies, is, to know God and Jesus

Christ, which is eternal life, John 17:3; and therefore to lay Jesus Christ as

the only foundation for our children to follow the moral principles of the Ten


Daniel Webster:

“If we abide by the principles taught in the BIBLE, our country will go on


Alexis de Toque Ville:

Page 7


[Upon visiting America in the early 19th century, this French historian observed]

“America is great because America is GOOD.

If America ever ceases to be good it will cease to be great. Everything is

extraordinary in America, the social condition of the inhabitants as well as the

laws; but the soil upon which these institutions are founded is more

extraordinary than all the rest. When the earth was given to men by the Creator,

the earth was inexhaustible; but men were weak and ignorant, and when they had

learned to take advantage of the treasures, which it contained, they already

covered its surface and were soon obliged to earn by the sword an asylum for

repose and freedom. Just then North America was discovered, as if it had been

kept in reserve by the Deity and had just risen from beneath the waters of the


Alma agrees with Alexis. In Alma 36:30 he tells his son Helaman: “…in as

much as ye shall keep the commandments of God ye shall prosper in the land; and

ye ought to know also, that inasmuch as ye will not keep the commandments of god

ye shall be cut off from his presence. Now this is according to his word.”

Most of what you read here has been erased from our textbooks.

Revisionists have rewritten history to remove the truth about our country’s

Christian roots. You are encouraged to share this with others, so that the truth

of our nation’s history will be told.

This information shared is only a drop of cement to help secure a

foundation that is crumbling daily in a losing war that most of the country

doesn’t even know is raging on, in, and around them….

When our sojourn in this life started, one of our most prized possessions

was our free agency. This is still true today. ”

Besides the preaching of the Gospel, we have another mission, namely, the

perpetuation of the free agency of man and the maintenance of liberty, freedom,

and the rights of man.” Neither the price Christ paid for our atonement, nor the

marvelous work of the restoration of the Church will do anyone any good unless

they, of their own free will, choose to take advantage of the blessings they are

afforded in the gospel. The last time someone tried to force us to obey the laws

we ended up fighting a war over it. We all fought with our Older Brother, Jesus

Christ, and with Adam to retain our free agency, at any price.

Our free agency is a gift from God that was paid for by the blood of our

brother, Jesus Christ. Christ died that we might have the freedom to choose and

follow Father’s plan. Father’s plan could not exist if we did not have our free

agency. We negate the effects of Christ’s sacrifice for us to the extent to

which we either give up our free agency or try and destroy another’s free agency.

As with other situations, we must ask questions to find out what our

present condition is. If one is to determine if his or her free agency is still

in tact, one must first determine who one is. In fact, “Who am I” is as

important as “Where did I come from?” “Why am I here?” and “Where am I going?”

If one can develop his or her relationship with our Heavenly Father to the point

that the veil can be parted, one can be told who he or she is. However, for our

purposes, free agency must be dealt with in terms of citizenship. To understand

one’s citizenship, one MUST understand JURISDICTION. Under the Constitution for

the united states, four jurisdictions are allowed in which the courts may

operate: (1) at Law (Common Law), (2) in Equity, (3) in Admiralty, (4) as a

portion or Admiralty, Treaties [The International Law Merchant].


The University of Houston did a seven-year study on the Constitution. They used

15,284 sources and determined that sixty four percent of our Constitution comes

from Common Law.

Page 8


Common Law is based on God’s Law. In large part, it came from eighth,

ninth, tenth and eleventh century pure Christian courts of England, which were

based primarily on the Pentateuch, and Psalms in the Bible, along with a little

Roman law. It emerged in England out of disputes over allodial land boundaries

(sovereign ownership of land). Thus the Common law is the “law of the land.” It

carried forward the jury system from the Law of Moses and many, many writs and

processes of government. It is the collective organization of the individual

right to lawful defense, uniformity of law, and due process of law when and where

it is applied, by government, against the individual. It is the will of the

majority, tempered with, and balanced by, the sanctity of rights bestowed upon

the individual at birth. These are rights, which, in the Mosaic model given at

Sinai, come from God, and are, thus, rights mankind may not alienate. Thus the

term “unalienable rights.” A cornerstone of this system generally called “the

Common Law” is its systematic organization of the natural right of lawful

defense. It is the substitution of a common force for individual forces, which

is to do only what the individual forces have a natural and lawful right to do:

to protect persons, liberties and properties; to maintain the right of each

individual, and to cause justice to reign over us all. Since an individual

cannot lawfully use force against the person, liberty or property of another

individual, the common force – for the same reason – cannot lawfully be used to

destroy the person, liberty or property of individuals or groups. Law allows you

to do anything you want to, as long as you don’t infringe upon the life, liberty

or property of anyone else. Law does not compel performance; it can only compel

punishment upon conviction of a man for his trespass upon the life, liberty or

property of another. In this system, government has no unalienable rights since

it cannot come into the world by birth. It is a creation of men, and must

therefore be subordinate to the rights of men.

This was the system of law that the Ammonites attempted to emplace in

Alma 30. However, they did not have the advantage of a three-century history of

embedding such sacred principles into a body of Law as did our Founding Fathers.

All too many times, in the Book of Mormon, the “will of the people” [a democracy]

was corrupted and they were enslaved [rewarded] by corrupt Kings or Judges. This

is a lesson for our times. The proven method to strip people of their God given

rights is to move them into a democracy. Then they can easily be moved into a

dictatorship or monarchy.

Article three, which places Common Law as the first jurisdiction the courts are

allowed to sit in, creates a natural separation of church and state. Sometimes

what the Framers did not say is more important than what they did say. In this

case they were saying that we could not have witch-hunts, inquisitions, etc. If

someone is to be charged with a crime, they must be charged with violations that

are established within this well-founded body of law. In our Republic, all would

have the freedom to worship as they wish, but would not be punished by another

man’s religion. This is consistent with our 11th Article of Faith, and the

concept that there must be opposition in all things. If one chooses to fail, the

system must allow that. We all fought for that free agency in the pre-existence.

This has been purposefully misinterpreted in order to move us away from this

sacred system of Law and into a self imposed system of compelled performance.

It has been said that we should render unto Caesar that which is

Caesar’s. In our system of government, WE are intended to be Sovereign Citizens

– the “Caesars.” The People are intended to be the Supreme Law of the Land. Our

forefathers established a Constitutional Republic. This makes us responsible to

uphold and abide by God’s law. Every man over the age of eighteen was to be a

lawyer, which means that he was to be well versed in God’s Law. This was done

under the direction of our Heavenly Father and Jesus Christ, not as a feudal

fascism run by an oligarchy of murderous and greedy warmongers, who, as a normal

method of doing things, operate by fraud and secrecy. All who engage in the

service of our government would have to agree to abide by our Constitution, which

is an instrument of Common Law procedure.

In England, only the King could hold allodial title to property. Subjects were

granted “tenor” and paid feudal duties [property taxes]. These privileges could

be revoked, depending on how well you supported the King’s programs. In one

twenty-two year period, after the War of Independence and signing the

Constitution, Congress passed some 13 acts guaranteeing every man, woman and

Page 9


child allodial property rights. Thus we can understand why a man really was the

King of his own castle, had has the same prerogatives and rights as the King.

And, there could be no claim of ignorance of the law, because the law was setting

on the mantle.

Today’s so-called laws (ordinances, statutes, acts, regulations, orders,

precepts, etc.) are often erroneously perceived as Law, but just because

something is called a “law” does not necessarily make it a law. There is a

difference between “legal” and “lawful.” The former is mere policy. The latter

comes from a delegation of authority, which eventually derives from our Heavenly

Father, and is, thus, superior and paramount. Anything the government does, as a

matter of policy, ordained by men, may be legal, but it may not be lawfully

authorized by God. In some counties in Nevada, prostitution is “legal.” Are we

then justified in abiding in the law — and in partaking? In 1976, our

“lawmakers” had the opportunity to make sodomy “illegal” in the District of

Columbia. They voted against the measure, thus maintaining the “legality” of

sodomy. Why should it even have to come up for a vote? Until 1976, by policy,

it was “legal” to shoot (“extermination or expulsion”) Mormons on sight in

Missouri as per an order issued by Governor Lilburn W. Boggs on October 27, 1838.

However, I think we can agree that this would not be “lawful.” Another case of

reversing of the true order of how things should be is that of the media that has

been used to drag Common Law through the mud and give us an incorrect

interpretation of Common Law.

Any time someone is charged under the Common Law, there must be a damaged

party. Again, you are free to do anything you please, as long as you do not

infringe on the life, liberty or property of someone else. The law does not

allow for any government action, which prevents a man from making his own choices

in the pursuit of happiness. For example, if one does not wear a seat belt, who

is damaged? No one. We, however, are bound to a higher law, not to be compelled

in all things. And even though Common Sense tells us to wear a seat belt, this

seat belt “law” cannot be an application of Common Law because Common Law cannot

compel performance. Any violation of Common Law is a CRIMINAL ACT and is



Equity is law [Contract Law], which compels performance for any contract

you are a party to, and is based on what is fair in any particular situation.

The term “equity” denotes the spirit and habit of fairness, justice and right

dealing, which would regulate the dealings of men with men. It compels you to

perform to the exact letter of any contract that you are under. So, if you have

compelled performance, there must be a contract somewhere, and you are being

compelled to perform under the obligation of that contract. You have no rights

unless specified in your contract, other than to have any disputes or

controversies, that arise out of it, be judged by the application of law, under

the restrictions of due process. Now, when dealing with contracts, the

jurisdiction is primarily equitable, and expresses or strongly implies assent or

agreement of both parties. Without any evidence proving consent, disputes and

controversies arising from the contracts can only be heard as civil actions.

Without a knowing, intentional and voluntary agreement to the contract, an action

in Equity has no criminal aspects. In Equity Jurisdiction, you cannot be tried

criminally, but you can be compelled to perform to the letter of a contract. If

you then refuse to perform, as directed by the court, you can then be charged

with contempt of court, which is a quasi-criminal action. Are our seat belt laws

Equity Laws? No, they are not, because in Equity you cannot be penalized or

punished for not keeping to the letter of a contract you did not knowingly,

intentionally, and voluntarily make, in which you agreed to wear seatbelts. What

most people do not know, however, is that their signature on an application for a

driver’s license is considered proof of their agreement to the contract. The

problem is that the signature may have been obtained voluntarily, but under

circumstances where the signer was not told that the application is a contract.

Also, elements of duress and coercion are introduced by these agencies not

informing the applicant that by signing such application they are declaring

themselves citizens of a foreign jurisdiction and that the agency has

intentionally failed to provide you with a satisfactory opportunity to apply

Page 10


under policies engendered for an American Citizen. As such, how can there be any

knowing, willing and intentional assent or agreement?


This is a military styled jurisdiction, which has a criminal and a civil

side. The modern innovation of both brought inland has been developed and allowed

to evolve into the advent of policy setting and the custom of compelled

performance for everything. In law, this is technically referred to as:

quasi-criminal, which means that failure to perform on a civil contract carries

with it criminal sanctions. There are penalties imposed for not adhering to the

letter of the contract, but this is only supposed to apply to International

Contracts. Now we can see which jurisdiction the seat belt laws (and all traffic

laws, building codes, ordinances, tax codes, etc.) are promulgated under.

Whenever there is a penalty for failure to perform (such as willful failure to

file a tax return) that is the Admiralty jurisdiction being brought upon the

land. Technically, in law, this is called Vice-Admiralty. Thus, for the courts

to have jurisdiction over you inland, there must be a valid International

Contract in force to which you are a party.

However, the courts don’t want to admit that they are operating under

Admiralty/Maritime Jurisdiction, so they took the Law of Nations and adopted it

into our civil codes. This has to do with commerce and thus we have part of the

picture of what we call the International Law Merchant. That is what the Supreme

Court decided in the Tompkins v. Erie Pennsylvania Railroad case — that the

Court’s decisions will be based “civilly” on Commercial Law or Business Law: that

is, “the Law Merchant.” And, that it will have criminal sanctions associated

with it during the penalty phase. Since they were instructed not to call it

Admiralty/Maritime Jurisdiction they called it Statutory Jurisdiction and lumped

the civil judgment process together with the criminal sanctions portions.

Prior to 1938, the Supreme Court was dealing with Public Law. Since

1938, the Supreme Court has dealt with “Public Policy.” Public Policy concerns

commercial transactions made primarily under the Negotiable Instruments Law,

which is a commercial category of the International Law Merchant. This has been

codified into what is now known as the Uniform Commercial Code, which system of

laws was made uniform throughout the fifty States through the cunning of the

Congress of the United States (which “United States” has its origin in Article 1,

Section 8, Clause 17 of the Constitution, as distinguished from the “united

states,” which is the Union of [the fifty] several states). Some legal scholars

claim that this is the year (Common) Law was blended with Equity. In the

landmark Supreme Court case of Tompkins v. Erie Pennsylvania Railroad a suit was

brought by Mr. Tompkins, who had been struck by a board that was sticking out of

a passing railroad car. Under Common Law he would have had a case because he had

been damaged. In law this is called a “Tort” action. However, in 1938, all the

higher judges, the top attorneys, and the U.S. Attorneys were called into a

secret meeting and were told that America is a bankrupt nation; it is owned

completely by its creditors. The creditors own the Congress, they own the

Executive, they own the Judiciary and they own all the State governments. Take

silent Judicial Notice of this fact, but never reveal it openly in court. Your

court is operating in an Admiralty Jurisdiction — call it anything you want, but

do not call it Admiralty. So, in the Tompkins case, the Court ruled on the basis

of Commercial Law: (Negotiable Instruments/Contract Law) that this man was not

under any contract with the Erie Pennsylvania Railroad that allowed him to be on

the property to start with, and, therefore, he had no standing to sue the


This overturned a standing decision of almost 100 years. Swift v. Tyson

in 1840 was a similar case, and the decision of the Supreme Court was that in any

case of this type, (a Tort) the court would judge the case based upon the Common

Law of the State where the incident occurred — in this case Pennsylvania. But

in the Tompkins v. Erie Pennsylvania Railroad case, the Supreme Court ruled that

all Federal cases will be judged under the Negotiable Instruments Law. There

would be no more decisions based on the Common Law at the Federal level. So here

we find the blending of Law with Equity.

Page 11


I believe we have seen this kind of secret combination before. A very

large portion of the Book of Mormon is dedicated to what happens when we let

these secret combinations take over our courts, law making bodies and governments

in general. Brother Hugh Nibley dedicates an entire section of his book Since

Cumora to what he terms “Gadiantonism.” (See Exhibit A) It has destroyed every

government within which it has ever been allowed to operate. We’ll come back to

that later.

The reason the Courts cannot tell you that you are in Admiralty/Maritime

Jurisdiction (actually it is Vice-Admiralty) is that your defense would be quite

different in an Admiralty Jurisdiction than it would be under Common Law. In

Admiralty, no court has jurisdiction over you unless you are a party to a valid

international contract that is in dispute or you are a captured prisoner, refugee

or citizen living under martial law in a time of war and/or military occupation.

If you know that the court is sitting in Admiralty Jurisdiction, and they have

admitted so on the record, according to the “rule of decision of the Common Law

of England,” you can demand that the International Maritime Contract, to which

you are supposedly a party, and which you supposedly breached, be placed into

evidence. You would then inform the court that you were not aware that you were

a party to any International Maritime Contract in existence, and refute your

signature upon said contract. The burden of proof of Jurisdiction then falls

upon the court. But they will not “declare standing without dishonor” because

they would have to place the National Debt into evidence as a part of that

International Maritime Contract. They would then have to admit that the

international bankers own the entire nation, and that we are their slaves. This

is the jurisdiction we would have to be in for foreigners (non-citizens) to have

control of their newly acquired property (by bankruptcy in 1933) and it is what

allows so many foreigners to own land in this country.

In the past, the courts were very aware of this issue, and were willing

to declare their jurisdiction without dishonor. “We [courts] have no more right

to decline the exercise of jurisdiction which is given, than to usurp that which


Again, it is clear, in the statement of the Judge, that one must declare

jurisdiction, without dishonor, if he expects the court to respect his legal


Another reason it is not expedient for them to tell everyone, at this

time, that they own everything is that there are still too many citizens in this

country with privately owned guns. This is not specifically about owning a gun.

It is about your right to defend yourself against your own government after they

have relieved you of that capability. In the 20th Century, after governments

have taken the peoples’ right to own guns, these repressive governments have not

been held in check, and have slaughtered an estimated 119,000,000 men, women and

children. (See EXHIBIT B) So until they can gradually consolidate all armies

into a WORLD ARMY and all courts into a single WORLD COURT, it is not expedient

for them to admit that the jurisdiction the courts are operating under is

fictitious. This is especially true when attempts to apply Admiralty/Maritime

are done while claiming that the judiciary actors are operating within the

confines of Constitutional due process. When we understand these things, we

realize that there are certain secrets they don’t want to admit, and we can use

this to our advantage.

You may ask how we, the free, Preamble Citizenry of the Sovereign States,

got into a situation where we could be charged with failure to wear seat belts,

and be fined for it when we are supposed to be in a jurisdiction that does not

compel performance. Wasn’t it Satan’s plan to compel us to live the laws? Isn’t

the judge sworn to uphold the Constitution? Yes, he is. And under Common Law,

for the court to have jurisdiction, the Prosecution would have to produce the

damaged person, property or liberty by which the charges are being made.

Technically, in law, it is called the “corpus delecti.” But you must understand

that the Constitution, in Article 1, Section 10, Clause 1, allows for unlimited

right to contract, to both government and private individuals, as long as we do

not infringe on the life, liberty or property of someone else. Contracts are

enforceable, and the Constitution allows four jurisdictional categories where

contracts can be enforced — At Law, in Equity, in Admiralty and by Treaty [the

International Law Merchant]. But we often find these latter three combined and

enforced in a Statutory Jurisdiction, which by the Constitution, which is the

Page 12


overall governing statement, is subordinate to any unalienable rights to due

process. We should be able to seek remedy, for example, against a railroad that

was negligent, and have the case heard as a Tort action. But this is something

the secret combination would prefer not take place. Your knowledge of this

inconsistency can be embarrassing for the courts. If we volunteer ourselves into

this jurisdiction, which, due to our ignorance, and their lack of morals, they

have gotten us to acquiesce to, then they, by threat and deception, compel our

compliance against the requirements of due process. And, they do it with

impunity so often, it has become custom. By rulemaking and legislation, we have

allowed policy to be enforceable and rights subordinated to the point where we

have to abide by that policy rather than assert rights. And we must then appeal

all the way to the Supreme Court to re-establish those rights as rights and not

just public policy privileges.

It is illegal to sign a contract and then not perform. And the Church is

not going to counsel us to default on a contract we’ve signed. Our recourse is

to exercise a legal remedy to refute, rebut, object to or effectively counter

their policy so as to claim our rights as superior and paramount to such

fraudulent contracts.

Under Common Law, every contract must be entered into knowingly,

intentionally and voluntarily, by both parties, or it is void and unenforceable.

These are characteristics of a Common Law contract. There is another

characteristic — it must be based on substance. For example, contracts used to

read, “…for one dollar and/or other valuable considerations, I will paint your

house, etc.” That was a valid contract — the dollar was genuine (backed in gold

or silver). Now, suppose you wrote a contract that said, “…for one Federal

Reserve Note and/or other considerations, I will paint your house…” And

suppose, for example I painted your house the wrong color. Could you go into a

Common Law Court and get justice? No, you could not. You see, a Federal Reserve

Note is a debt instrument. That makes it a “colorable” dollar, as it has no

substance, and in a Common Law Jurisdiction, that contract would be


“Colorable” means something that appears to be genuine, but is not.

Maybe it looks like a dollar, and maybe it spends like a dollar, but if it is not

redeemable for lawful money (Silver or Gold), it is “colorable.” If a Federal

Reserve Note is used in a contract, then the contract becomes a “colorable”

contract. And “colorable” contracts must be enforced under a “colorable”

jurisdiction. So by creating Federal Reserve Notes, the government had to create

a jurisdiction to cover the kinds of contracts, which use them. We now have what

is called Statutory Jurisdiction, which is not genuine Admiralty Jurisdiction

because the substance of Admiralty, i.e. the International Law Merchant, is gold.

It is a “colorable” [Vice] Admiralty Jurisdiction the judges are enforcing

because we are using “colorable money.” Colorable Admiralty is now known as

Statutory Jurisdiction. Let’s see how we got under this Statutory Jurisdiction.

The government set up a “colorable” law system to fit the “colorable”

currency. It used to be called the International Law Merchant or the Negotiable

Instruments Law, which governed the handling of Redeemable, Negotiable and

Non-negotiable Instruments, because it primarily dealt with paper, which was

redeemable in something of substance. But, once Federal Reserve Notes had become

unredeemable, there had to be a system of law, which was completely “colorable”

from start to finish. This system of law was codified as the Uniform Commercial

Code, and has been adopted in every State. This is “colorable” law, and it is

used in all courts. It constitutes what is called: PUBLIC POLICY. This body of

policy can be found in California primarily in the California Code of


The primary users, understanders and codifiers of Commercial Law in

Western civilization, and perhaps the world, are the Jews. This is Mosaic Law

they have had for 4,000+ years. The Maxims of Commercial Law are: 1) A workman

is worthy of his hire. Thou shalt not steal. [Exodus 20:15; Leviticus 19:13;

Deuteronomy 24:14-15; Matthew 20:8; James 5:4] The labor laws in this nation are

all based on this premise — the laborer is worthy of his hire, so pay him what

you agreed to pay him and hold nothing back. This goes to the maxim of the

united States Constitution by the Fifth Amendment — Just Compensation; 2) All

are equal under the law. [Numbers 15:22-29; Leviticus 24:22; Proverbs 22:2;

Page 13


James 2] Punishment is to be equal, i.e. commensurate with the crime, “…an

eye for an eye..” [Exodus 21:23-25; Leviticus 4:20; Deuteronomy 19:21]

[Leviticus 24:18] one fifth (20%) more [Leviticus 6:5] double value [Exodus 22:7]

Solomon ordered seven fold [Proverbs 7:30-31] under United States Criminal Code –

18 USC – triple damages; 3) In Commerce, Truth is Sovereign. [II Chronicles

18:15] The reference to the oath sworn in court – “I promise to tell the whole

truth and nothing but the truth, so help me God.” [Exodus 18:21; Zechariah 8:16]

“…speak ye every man the truth…execute the judgment of truth…” [John 8:32]

“…the truth shall make you free.” 4) Truth is expressed in the form of an

affidavit. [Exodus 20:16] 5) An unrebutted affidavit stands as truth in

Commerce. [John 8:7] The Lord is not rebutted. 6) An unrebutted affidavit

becomes the judgment in Commerce. In the passages above, they all judged

themselves to be sinners. They knew the law, their sin and the judgment for

their sin was death by the law. They acquiesced to the point of their own

judgment. From another standpoint, the maxim of he who leaves the battlefield

first loses. [I Samuel 17:42-52] 7) All matters must be expressed to be

resolved. We are not mind readers and matters cannot otherwise be introduced. [I

Kings 3:16-27; II Samuel 12:1-14] 8) Sacrifice is the measure of credibility.

No willingness to sacrifice = no liability, responsibility, authority or measure

of conviction. The life of Christ, Job and later Paul are examples [Acts

7:54-60] 9) A lien or claim can be satisfied only through an affidavit by a

point-by point rebuttal, resolution by jury or payment. California Civil Code

Sections 2903, 2904 and 2905. This has the spiritual background in that Christ

came to redeem the world (buy it back) from Satan who owned it by the granting of

title to him by Adam’s beguiled posterity.

Every system of civilized law must have two other characteristics: Remedy

and Recourse. Remedy is a way to get out from under a bad law. Recourse is the

mechanism the law provides, whereby you can recover your losses, if you have been


all have remedy and recourse. When you pick up a volume of the Uniform

Commercial Code and try to read it, it will seem to have been intentionally

written to be confusing. It took a long time to discover where the Remedy and

Recourse are found in the U.C.C. They are found right in the first volume, at

1-103 and 1-207. That’s correct! Also, Common Law comes right through the

U.C.C. in re-statements of it at subsection 1-103. Under the U.C.C. all

contracts must be entered into:

(1) Knowingly, (2) intentionally and, (3) voluntarily.

The Uniform Commercial Code has nine (9) essential elements: (1) Good

Faith Action; (2) Clean Hands doctrine; (3) Fair Business Practice; (4) Full

Disclosure (discovery); (5) Duty of Care; (6) Just Compensation; (7) Equal

Protection of the Law;

(8) Mercy; (9) Grace. A violation of any of these is a violation of the U.C.C.

in its entirety.

The UCC says: “The Code is complementary to the Common Law, which remains

in force, except where replaced by the code. A statute should be construed in

harmony with the Common Law, unless there is a clear legislative intent to

abrogate the Common Law.” The Code recognizes Common Law. Therefore, if you

have made a sufficient, timely and explicit reservation of your rights, as at

1-207, you may then insist that the statutes be construed in harmony with the

Common Law. And this is because the Code cannot be read to preclude a Common Law

Action. To say that one does not recognize Common Law is to say that they do not

recognize God’s Laws, the State and National Organic Constitutions, nor the

current system of laws.

This possession of rights under the U.C.C., however, is not a given.

“The making of a valid Reservation of Rights preserves whatever rights the person

then possesses, and prevents the loss of such rights by application of concepts

of waiver or estoppels.”

One must exercise his own free agency — take some action — or he will

lose his rights.

“When a waivable right or claim is involved, the failure to make a reservation

Page 14


thereof, causes a loss of the right, and bars its assertion at a later date.”

You have to make your claim early. Further it says:

“The sufficiency of the Reservation — any expression indicating an intent to

reserve rights, is sufficient, such as ‘without prejudice.’ ”

When you use “without prejudice UCC 1-207” in connection with your

signature, you are saying, i.e.:

“I reserve my right not to be compelled to perform under any unrevealed,

unilateral, commercial, adhesion agreement or contract that I did not enter

knowingly, intentionally and voluntarily. And furthermore, I do not accept the

liability of the compelled benefit of any unrevealed contracts or commercial


Requesting the privilege of operating a bank demand account (a checking or

savings account) initiates what is called an “Adhesion” contract. It stays with

you for life unless you exercise your rights and file documentation to cancel

this unrevealed contract. The contract says that you agree to become subject to

the rules and regulations of the Federal Reserve, i.e. file tax returns, pay

whatever they define as taxes, etc. “A contract so heavily restrictive of one

party, while so nonrestrictive of another, that doubts arise as to whether it is

a voluntary agreement. The term signifies a grave inequality of bargaining power

that may lead the contract to be declared invalid.”

Under the U.C.C. one does not have a clear and valid protection of

rights, which automatically self-asserts. This is evidence of the fact that we

no longer live under Common Law (unalienable rights) under Article three of the

Constitution, but that we, by stealthy encroachment of the commercial interests

upon substantive due process, have been switched into a jurisdiction of compelled

performance. And more often than not, without our knowledge, and through no

small effort to prevent full disclosure of this reality to us. Under the U.C.C.,

even contracts are not necessary. Under this re-statement of the old law,

“agreements” can be binding, and if you only exercise the benefit of an

“agreement,” it is presumed or implied that you intend to meet the “obligations”

associated with those benefits. If you accept a benefit offered by the

government, then you are obligated to follow, to the letter, each and every

statute involved with that benefit regarding the performance of duties attached

thereto. Their method has been to get everybody partaking of a public, sponsored

benefit, and they don’t even tell the people what the benefit is. They then

compel performance to a “code” [Statutory] that will subjugate, bind or otherwise

restrict the individual’s life, liberty or pursuit of happiness, with benefit to

the State, and at the same time make it appear as if the “subject” had

“volunteered” himself into the privilege by filling the appropriate form

(contract?) in which it appears, by the printed word, that the person requested

the privilege. Some examples of this are: (1) Driver’s License (2) Marriage

License (3) Birth Certificate (4) Social Security Account Number. In

California, under similar circumstances in the private sector, such intentional

mis-directions and withholding of full disclosure would be actionable under a

civil cause of action entitled “Deceit,” which is a re-statement of the Common

Law against Fraud. In this case, the re-statement invokes penalties for a

particular style of Fraud.

I also believe there is good evidence showing these “voluntarily

contracted for” benefits [so-called] are being used to move us into the position

of having to forego paying our debts. Instead we are saddled with mere

“satisfaction of obligations with limited liability,” instead of paying debts.

Thus, we are left without a means of paying any debt. Since we have not paid our

debts at Law we are left without recourse. (See U.C.C. 3-501 for the published

authority on how any claims against individuals for these debts are to be handled

under those conditions.) This is what is known as an “unconscionable” or

“overreaching” contract.

It is my view that those engaging in these practices of deceit, desire a

result, which leaves us in a circumstance of perpetual debt. This puts those

desirous of asserting substantive rights in a situation where they are living

completely under the Uniform Commercial Code. Thus we are compelled or duped

into using non-redeemable, negotiable instruments and we are merely discharging

Page 15


obligations to the system rather than paying debt. If one believes the axiom

that says “there is no free lunch,” one can understand that the price for the

benefit of mere “discharging of obligations” in Equity, which carries with it an

attached benefit known as “limited liability;” i.e., using Federal Reserve Notes

instead of gold or silver coin as a medium of exchange, is compelled performance

[servitude] to the true owner of the property. The owner of the Note [debt

instrument] is the true owner of the property until its true value [debt] is

paid. You cannot buy something of value [homes, real estate, food, clothing,

etc.] with something that has no value, without partaking in the corporate

benefits of the Federal Reserve Corporation. When one does use such a compelled

benefit he sells himself into slavery.

“Under the new law the money is issued to the banks in return for government

obligations, bills of exchange, drafts, notes, trade acceptances and bankers

acceptances. The money will be worth 100 cents on the dollar, because it is

backed by the credit of the nation. It will represent a mortgage on all the

homes, and other property of all the people in the nation.” [NOTE: that this is

unconstitutional. The Constitution gives congress the power “To borrow money on

the credit of the united States;” but does not give it the authority to use your

property as collateral. This is also a clear violation of allodial property

rights guaranteed to individuals by the Constitution. They are using public

money – full faith and credit of the united states – for private use (paying off

the private individuals that originally owned the Federal Reserve). This is

called conversion under the UCC at 3-419, and is a punishable offense.]

In our current system, one has little choice but to use FRNs and thus the remedy

must be provided when an individual, free inhabitant makes the decision to

redress grievances and assert substantive rights, especially due process rights.

As with the Atonement, we have to exercise our free agency to invoke this remedy

— UCC1-207. “He only could unlock the gates of Heaven and let us in.”

In offering grants benefit in the form of negotiable paper [Federal

Reserve Notes], which Congress gave to the fifty States of the Union for

education, highways, health and other purposes; Congress bound all the States of

the Union into commercial agreements with the Federal United States (as

distinguished from the Continental united states). The fifty States accepted the

“benefits” offered by the agreement between the Federal United States and the

respective Corporate States. The Corporate States were then obligated to perform

on the specific terms and conditions of those contracts to abide by the policy

set by the Congress of the Federal United States. This would of necessity involve

the “State of California” (Inc.) assuming their portion of the equitable debts of

the Federal United States to the international banking houses for the credit

loaned. The credit that each State received, in the form of Federal grants, was

predicated upon this equitable paper, or in other words, “Obligations in


This system of negotiable paper binds all Corporate entities of

government together in a vast system of commercial agreements and is what has

altered our court system, from one under the “Common Law,” as stated in Article 3

of the Constitution, to an Article 1 Legislative Court or Tribunal system of

commercial law. We, the people, lost our guaranteed unalienable rights and were

forced into acceptance of the equitable, commercially styled privileges and

benefits, which obligations bound the once free inhabitants of the united states

to this very same commercial contract. This converted the high status of “free

inhabitant” to that of a “subject” to that entity of government, and divorcing

the rest of us from our Sovereign status, on the land, within the Republics.

Thus, the Sovereign State, with a Republican form of government, was stealthily

converted into a Quasi-Federal Territory otherwise known as an enclave, and is

currently portrayed as a Democracy [Mob Rule]. Federal enclaves are

jurisdictionally on a par with military shipyards, army bases, arsenals and Post

Offices, to mention a few examples. Anyone taking up space and breathing the air

is construed to be a “resident.” Resident carries with it quite a lot of

attaching jurisdictional obligations, which could never operate against a free

inhabitant, domiciled on the land, administrated through a bona fide Republican

form of government. The Constitution for the united states guarantees us these

Republican forms for state governments in which we live. There is no violation

of this however, if We the People, as free inhabitants, in California’s Republic,

voluntarily choose to step off of the State’s free soil, and into the gates of an

Page 16


artificially created Federal enclave. And, of course, along with this, would be

the presumption that this was done knowingly, intentionally and voluntarily.

That is, unless someone objected timely or upon their discovery of a design to

induce them to such a waiver of their unalienable rights. Those persons brought

before any commercial courts in the enclaves are held to the letter of every

policy of government set at the Federal, State, County or Municipal levels unless

they have exercised the REMEDY provided for them within the re-statements of

their original substantive rights, exercised through the Common Law, by that very

system of Commercial Law. A system whereby, when forced to use a so-called

“benefit” offered, or available, to them from government, a litigant may invoke

their former right, under the COMMON LAW guarantee of due process. If this were

honored, one of the key aspects of this due process would be full disclosure,

under the rules of discovery, which are the same in either forum. At that point,

evidence would come to light, which would support and substantiate the deceit, or

at the very least show that the contracts for benefits and privileges were not

entered into knowingly, intentionally and voluntarily. This would then make

possible an access to remedy and a ruling, ordering such a free inhabitant not be

bound by any contract or commercial agreement that they did not enter into

knowingly, intentionally and voluntarily.

It was around the time of the War Between the States, that these crafty

purveyors of deceit, discovered a flaw in the Constitution. In 1863 President

Lincoln had followed up the Emancipation Proclamation with what we now call the

Thirteenth Amendment. It caused a huge problem. The Negroes could not be

magically endowed with the requisite qualifications to become electors, suitable

for the voting rolls, in the several State Republics. Thus they would not be

able to operate as free men and women. Technically, even under the plan, which

was adopted to make them all, in effect, citizens of the District of Columbia,

where Congress exercised exclusive jurisdiction to legislate in all cases

whatsoever, the Constitution for the united states still required that one be

white to be a citizen. The International Bankers were in a panic because there

would be no provision to tax the fruit of the labor of these newly freed

“persons” unless there could be provision to tie the loans made by these

International Bankers to the production that would surely derive from the

endeavors of these newly created “persons.” It was decided that their tie would

be the supposedly natural obligation to their citizenship. A “second class”

citizenship had to be created.

The Amendment was done, in my opinion, incorrectly. It should have been amended

to allow everyone born or naturalized to be an American Citizen, regardless of

race, religion, gender or creed. This means that they would be guaranteed all

Constitutional rights, including the right to be a Citizen of whichever Republic

(State) they desire to be domiciled within.

In 1868 the Fourteenth Amendment was presented. Congressional records

state that it was never properly ratified. It is not law. However, it was

announced that it “appears” to have passed, and the government began to operate

as if it had. This is the functional equivalent of one of the earliest and

primitive Presidential policy setting actions in operation. The fraud ensued.

What they attempted to accomplish was to take advantage of a flaw that

was discovered in the Constitution at Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17. They had

discovered that a “nation” had been created after the style of a free-port upon

the shores of a “country.” In Law there is a marked difference between a

country, and a nation. The former can be found in transcripts we have of early

court cases in the courts of the several States. For example, the free

inhabitant did not ask for a jury trial, and in many cases, not even the trial by

jury. (the two are very different bodies of fact finders in Law.) Instead we

find the statement: of many litigants submitting their cases to their fellow free

inhabitants with the clause: “I put myself upon the country.” The country was

thus defined by function as a collection of living breathing freemen. A nation,

on the other hand is a designation of an artificial entity. In Law it is called

“a fiction of law.” It is characterized by its artificial nature and is thus

identified as the corporation. Thus, “the nation” or “national,” referred to the

District Ten Miles Square we call D.C., while “country” or “the country” referred

to the free inhabitants in their capacity as qualified electors, as a body

Page 17


politic, living on the land of their respective, autonomous and sovereign States.

A nation, in the sense used and intended concerning the District of Columbia, was

modeled after the pattern of corporate creations known colloquially in those days

as “free-ports.” Only by latter custom, use and policy may “The United States”

— a body of people having a defined territory and a governing body — be defined

as a “nation”.

However, this is in contradistinction to, and a very different thing

than, the country of We the People, who live on the land, in the Republics, as a

body of qualified electors. These two jurisdictions operate side by side

simultaneously. Thus, by custom, use and policy, the distinctions between them

have become blurred in many ways over the years. Yet these people, as a matter

of Law, still have the substantive right to a governing body consisting of three

branches. They are the Legislative, the Executive and the Judicial, with a

Constitution. There is a prescribed physical location of land, upon which, this

body of people are domiciled. Again, there is a very clear distinction in Law

between a “resident” and one who is “domiciled on the land of the Republic he or

she inhabits.” This latter status is of one who is a part of the body politic,

which gives life and substance to the concept we define as: Constitutional

Republic. We, the American Citizens, domiciled on the land, established as

Republics, yet styled as the several States, are protected from any direct rule

by Congress, as a matter of Law, by our individual state Constitutions. And, I

might add, the texts of our State Constitutions constitute a body of Law superior

and paramount to any statutory scheme, codified regulation, derived rule making

or policy, because they are the clear re-statement of biblical laws.

But, Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 gave Congress, which is the

legislative branch of the three-branch government, exclusive rule over a given

territory known as the District of Columbia. Here we have Congress as the

governing body, the ten miles square comprising the free-port known as the

District of Columbia, has been, in modern times, re-defined as a Federal

territory. This again was accomplished by mere policy and the body of people,

under the Law of the Sea there, are those congressionally created citizens who

reside within the District. They can also be those who have declared themselves

citizens of the District of Columbia by the misnomer: United States citizens.

Here we have a quasi-civilian district administrated after the pattern of a

corporation primarily concerned with the prizes, booty and “revenue” that can be

raised and/or extracted from the several States. Indeed as a free port operating

under the International Law Merchant, the Law of Nations and the Admiralty rules

of engagement on land, through policies of Vice-Admiralty, it is a Nation-State

which functions much like ancient Venice and the Greek city-States. It is a pure

Legislative Democracy within a structure dictated by the law of the sea. This

was and is a form of law very separate and distinct from the Law of the land

found amongst the free inhabitants domiciled on the land. This form of

government is not a Constitutional Republic. The law of the sea was never

intended to govern or set policy upon the land. This is including, but not

limited to, the policy of the free-port city-State we have, by custom and usage,

named as the national entity called The United States. This was not the intent

of the men who framed our governments in the beginning, after Britain was

defeated in the War for Independence. And the Supreme Court for the United

States has ruled time and time again, that the rule of interpretation of

controversies over the correct application of statutory enactments, within a

context of restrictions by the Constitutions, shall be governed by the intent of

the framers. Our Founding Fathers were men who often and at length, decried the

evils of legislative democracies by direct expression in writings galore. It can

never be maintained then, that it was ever the intent of the framers that the

Republics should be invaded by the contrivance of policy, no matter how

stealthily the encroachments, nor the level of their acceptance due to the

gradual pursuit of imposing them upon the land.

By law, within the territorial district where there is a Legislative

Democracy [Washington D.C.] in operation, Congress is not limited to passing laws

that are consistent with the Constitution. The District of Columbia is not a

Republic State, of the several States, of the Union of American Republics, and


rule over the District of Columbia because it is technically a military enclave,

and since it is administrated on the land, it is operated according to the rules

of Vice-Admiralty. The legislators can make laws by a majority vote only. Mere

Page 18


majority votes as opposed to unanimous votes or near unanimous votes are some of

the telltale differences between the forms of government called Democracy and

Republic. Thus, in a Democracy, the various bureaucrats in the enclave of D.C.

have been given the authority through administrative agents to enforce their own

law; and as a consequence, their administrative agency edicts and policy

decisions are their courts. Regardless of explanations in the media and public

institutions of learning to the contrary, these agency, policy setting, entities

function as the courts for the District and are in fact found to be a part of the

legislative branch of government there. They are empowered by a mere majority

vote, to try their own law. Here we have the legislature making the law,

enforcing the law, and trying the law, all within the one branch of government.

This is a one branch government operating within the enclave, in a separate and

distinct jurisdiction, which is territory not within the Republics, that being

pictured as a three branch government, as in Article III, section 2, clause 2 of

the Constitution. But even here there are expressed restrictions upon the range

and scope of such jurisdiction. The differences in jurisdictions, as matters of

law, become apparent by understanding the very terms we have been referencing

throughout this treatise. For example, distinctions are made between cases heard

under the law of Nations, (i.e., “…ambassadors and other public ministers and

councils…” [those who enjoy diplomatic immunity]), and those heard under the

International Law Merchant (i.e., “…to all cases of admiralty and maritime

jurisdiction…”) etc. When this one-branch, administrated, judicial forum was

expanded and allowed to operate on the Land against the person, property, name

and endeavors of the free inhabitants within the Republics, and was done so by

force through the Presidential edicts of Abraham Lincoln, the administrative

agencies were elevated to a supreme and paramount position. Thus, policy of the

executive branch became the rule-making and legislation, whereby the Republican

form of government, which the Federal Constitution was supposed to guarantee to

the States, was set aside, and that document became a dead letter. This

administrative forum, which, as the arm of a single branch of government, was

overspread throughout the several States, is nothing more than a star-chamber

proceeding. And to be blunt sir, this is the textbook definition of Tyranny.

This is quite different from the original pattern, which is expressly the intent

of the framers. That is specifically, a separation of powers in a three-branch

system within government, with two other branches of social administration

outside of government to further buffer the potential for absolute authority

concentrated in the hands of one or a few.

Under the three-branch government they designed, the Congress passes law,

which has to be in harmony with the Constitution. The Executive enforces the law

passed by Congress, and the Judiciary tries the law, pursuant to the

Constitution. The juries, both grand and trial juries, try the facts and judge

the law. Further, provisions were made in the event this Republican system broke

down and tyranny raised its ugly head again. The last argument against tyrants:

the right to keep and bear arms.


DEMOCRACY are today construed as one and the same. To have both called THE

UNITED STATES is deceitful and in gross error. One is the NATION: FEDERAL United

States; and the other is the COUNTRY: being the several [fifty Sovereign] united

states of America.

A Republic is the antithesis of a Democracy. The government of our

Republic is charged with the responsibility of protecting God-given, unalienable

[irrevocable by man] individual rights, conditional upon the individual’s endowed

covenant to abide by God-given laws, where as a Democracy protects the artificial

rights of the collective body, allowing revocable, man-made Civil Rights, and

thus is atheistic by nature. (See Exhibit C)

Democracy is temporary at best. If the desired end product is a Monarchy,

Democracy is your best vehicle. If you can create a little subterfuge along the

way, you can add in a road bump that resembles to a dictatorship. At about the

time our original 13 states adopted their new constitution, in the year 1787,

Alexander Tyler (a Scottish history professor at The University of Edinborough)

had this to say about “The Fall of The Athenian Republic” some 2,000 years prior.

“A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent

form of government. A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that

Page 19


voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public

treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates who

promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every

democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, (which is) always

followed by a dictatorship.”

“The average age of the worlds greatest civilizations from the beginning of

history, has been about 200 years. During those 200 years, these nations always

progressed through the following sequence:

From Bondage to spiritual faith;

From spiritual faith to great courage;

From courage to liberty;

From liberty to abundance;

From abundance to complacency;

From complacency to apathy;

From apathy to dependence;

From dependence back into bondage.”

Professor Joseph Olson of Hamline University School of Law, St. Paul, Minnesota,

points out some interesting facts concerning the most recent Presidential


Population of counties won by:

Gore=127 million

Bush=143 million

Square miles of land won by:



States won by:



Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by:



Professor Olson adds: “In aggregate, the map of the territory Bush won was mostly

the land owned by the tax-paying citizens of this great country.

Gore’s territory mostly encompassed those citizens living in government-owned

tenements and living off government welfare…”

Olson believes the U.S. is now somewhere between the “complacency and “apathy”

phase of Professor Tyler’s definition of democracy; with some 40 percent of the

nation’s population already having reached the “governmental dependency” phase.

Due to this information I have been studying, I now find myself asking

pointed questions when I hear someone say that they are a United States citizen.

Page 20


Like: “Which United States are you referring to?” And, “Do you mean by that,

that you are someone who lives in the District of Columbia or has declared

yourself a resident of the Federal Enclave called the District of Columbia?”

“What do you mean when you say that you are “a United States citizen?” The

remaining population in the fifty Republic States, which make up “the Country”

(American Nationals), is different than the national citizenry of the nation.

Further, State Citizens are also sometimes known as “Sovereign Citizens.”

Especially illustrative of this point is a statement of the Supreme Court for the

United States at fn. #63,ref. #3.

We the People are therefore domiciled in various Sovereign States

[Republics], by Law. As such, these “free inhabitants” are protected by the

Constitutions of those States from any direct rule of Congress over them, as the

Law intended them to be treated as “State Citizens.” In the democracy, anyone

who lives in those corporate enclaves is governed by the policy of administrative

territorial forums known as protectorates by the law of Nations belonging to

Washington D.C.; i.e., Guam, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, American Samoa; or

in any State using a two letter Corporate/Commercial abbreviation (i.e., AL, AK,

CA, etc.), and/or Zip Codes; or any other federally held territories. These are

“residents” of the enclave wherein they happen to claim citizenship. This in

contradistinction to those who are “domiciled” in a jurisdiction erected by

Constitution, on Land, to operate for the benefit of “free inhabitants,” most

often referenced in the case law as “Citizens of the States.” The former class

of American living in the Federal territories, be they far across the seas, or in

the nature of a federal enclave, arsenal, fort, base, port, dock, magazine, post

office or other needful building situated inland, has been established as a

citizen of the United States (D.C.)

The following statute dramatically demonstrates that Congress appreciates

the difference between the two classes, and knows how to discriminate against

“Citizens of the American republics” (a/k/a State Citizens) in favor of “citizens

of the United States” (a/k/a federal United States citizens):


To authorize the President to permit citizens of the American republics to

receive instruction at professional educational institutions and schools

maintained and administered by the Government of the United States or by

departments or agencies thereof.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of

America in Congress assembled, that the President be, and he hereby is,

authorized, in his discretion and under such regulations as he may prescribe by

Executive Order, to permit citizens of the American republics to receive

instruction, with or without charge therefore, at professional educational

institutions and schools maintained and administered by the Government of the

United States or by departments of agencies thereof:

Provided, that such citizens shall agree to comply with all regulations for the

government of the institutions and schools at which they may be under instruction

and to exert every effort to accomplish successfully the courses of instruction


And provided further, that the regulations prescribed by the President under the

authority of this Act shall contain provisions limiting the admission of citizens

of the American republic to primary schools maintained and administered by the

government of the United States so that there will under no circumstances be any

curtailment of the admission of citizens of the United States eligible to receive

instruction therein and not more than one citizen of any American republic shall

receive instruction at the same time in the United States Military Academy and

not more than one in the United States Naval Academy.

Approved, June 24, 1938

Page 21


One should also be aware that:

“There are over 100,000 elementary and secondary schools in the united

states. Each of these now has an invisible federal zone extending 1,000 feet

beyond the (often irregular) boundaries of the school property.

Why aren’t the government administrators affording their little Federal

citizens better protection on and around campus? Are there really any such

things as local school districts? Don’t people think they vote for a local

school board member?

Another area where this is apparent is in our court system. An

intentional discrimination against a class of persons, solely because of their

class, by officers in charge of the selection and summoning of grand jurors in a

criminal case, is a violation of the fundamental Rights of an accused. Such a

violation is not excused by the fact that the persons actually selected for jury

service otherwise possess the necessary qualifications for jurors as prescribed

by statute. Discrimination in the selection of a grand jury, as prohibited by

the U. S. Constitution, means an intentional, systematic non-inclusion because of

class. There are two (2) classes of citizenship in America. 28 U.S.C. 1865

(b)(1) specifically excludes those classes of Citizens who are not mentioned.

Expression unius est exclusio alterius.

To wit:

1865. Qualifications for jury service

(a) The chief judge of the district court, or such other district court judge

as the plan may provide … shall determine solely on the basis of information

provided on the juror qualification form and other competent evidence whether a

person is unqualified for, or exempt, or to be excused from jury service.

In making such determination the chief judge of the district court, or such other

district court judge as the plan may provide, shall deem any person qualified to

serve on grand and petit juries in the district court unless he – (1) is not a

citizen of the United States eighteen years old who has resided for a period of

one year within the judicial district…

In stark contrast, it is the policy of the United States that all

citizens shall have the opportunity to be considered for service on juries in the

district courts of the United States. To be constitutional, and to be consistent

with its legislative intent, the term “all citizens,” as that term is used in 28

U.S.C 1861 must be construed to include also Citizens of the freely associated

compact States (a/k/a/ State Citizens) who are not also citizens of the United

States (a/k/a “federal citizens”)

One of the deceitful purposes the enemies of Republican government have

attempted to accomplish by the purported passage of the Fourteenth Amendment, was

to cause us all — by “voluntary” contract (agreement) — to give up our State

Citizenship for the “privilege” of becoming a Federal United States citizen (a

resident [alien]). By “operation of law” this makes us citizens of a corporate

“nation.” We are supposed to receive many “benefits” (Social Security, Welfare,

etc.) and privileges (become slaves). But, as you know, a double-edged sword

cuts both ways. To acquire these privileges, we would also give up the

protection of our sacred united states Constitution. We would give up our

“unalienable” rights and live our lives by permission (permit, license, etc.)

from a Legislative Democracy in the form of “Civil” rights that can be changed at

their pleasure! (The Land of the “fee” and the home of the “slave?” Can this

really be the intent of the Framers?)

This is reminiscent of the time when Alma went to Ammonihah. Obviously,

the Lord knew what was transpiring there and sent an Angel to warn him:

“For behold, they do study at this time that they may destroy the liberty of thy

people, (for thus saith the Lord) which is contrary to the statues, and

judgments, and commandments which he has given unto his people.”

And it should be remembered that this people were blessed with an

Page 22


abundance of knowledge in that Alma’s companion, Amulek, reminds us that he is

“…a descendent of Aminadi [apparently from a part of the record we do not yet

have]…who interpreted the writing which was upon the wall of the temple, which

was written by the finger of God.” Now we can more fully understand the power of

the warning that Alma had just given them when he said that if: “…they could fall

into sins and transgressions, after having had so much light and so much

knowledge given unto them of the Lord their God.” I wonder if we, today, will

defend our sacred rights, as established in the Constitution or if we will just

be an addition to the saga of the Book of Mormon.

I ask you, do you think this was Heavenly Father’s intention after all he had

done to preserve this land and establish its Sacred Constitution?

“We should understand the Constitution as the founders meant that it should be

understood…Such understanding is essential if we are to preserve what God has

given us.”

“This nation and its Constitution are part of God’s plan to protect his

children’s freedom. Because of the freedoms here, the Lord could restore the

Gospel and bless the world.”

President George Albert Smith: “I am saying to you that to me the Constitution of

the United States of America is just as much from my Heavenly Father as the Ten

Commandments. When that is my feeling, I am going to try to keep it where the

Lord started it, and not let anti-Christ’s come into this country, that began

because people wanted to serve God.”

J. Ruben Clark: “So, Brethren, I wish you to understand that when we begin to

tamper with the Constitution, we begin to tamper with the Law of Zion, which God,

Himself, set up, and no one may trifle with the word of God with impunity.”

He also said:

“To me, the statement of the Lord, ‘I have established the Constitution of this

land,’ puts the Constitution of the united States in the position in which it

would be if it were written in this Book of Doctrine and Covenants itself. This

makes the Constitution the word of the Lord to us. That it was given, not by

oral utterance, but by the operation of his mind and spirit upon the minds of

men, inspiring them to the working out of this great document, of human

government, does not alter its authority…”

On February 21, 1871 another major change was made. Congress Passes an

Act to Provide a Government for the District of Columbia, also known as the Act

of 1871. With no constitutional authority to do so, Congress creates a separate

form of government for the District of Columbia, a ten-mile square parcel of land

(see, Acts of the Forty-first Congress,” Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and


Instead of having absolute and unalienable rights guaranteed under the

organic Constitution, we the people now have “relative” [civil] rights or

privileges. One example is the Sovereign’s right to travel, which has now been

transformed (under corporate government policy) into a “privilege” that requires

citizens to be licensed. By passing the Act of 1871, Congress committed TREASON

against the People who were Sovereign under the grants and decrees of the

Declaration of Independence and the organic Constitution. The Act of 1871 became

the FOUNDATION of all the treason since committed by government officials.

The United States of America isn’t a Country! It’s a Corporation!

In preparation for stealing America, the puppets of Britain’s banking

cabal had already created a second government, a Shadow Government designed to

manage what the common herd believed was a democracy, but what really was an

incorporated UNITED STATES. Together this chimera, this two-headed monster,

disallowed the common herd all rights of sui juris. [Individual sovereignty, to

be heard before the courts of this land.]

Congress, with no authority to do so, created a separate form of

government for the District of Columbia, a ten-mile square parcel of land. WHY

Page 23


and HOW did they do so? First, Lisa Guliani of Babel Magazine, reminds us that

the Civil War was, in fact, “little more than a calculated front with fancy

footwork by backroom players.” Then she adds:

“It was also a strategic maneuver by British and European

interests (international bankers) intent on gaining a stranglehold on the coffers

of America. And, because Congress knew our country was in dire financial straits,

certain members of Congress cut a deal with the international bankers (in those

days, the Rothschilds of London were dipping their fingers into everyone’s pie).

There you have the WHY, as to why members of Congress permitted the international

bankers to gain further control of America.

“Then, by passing the Act of 1871, Congress formed a corporation

known as THE UNITED STATES. This corporation, owned by foreign interests, shoved

the organic version of the Constitution aside by changing the word ‘for’ to ‘of’

in the title. Let me explain: the original Constitution drafted by the Founding

Fathers read: ‘The Constitution for the united states of America.’ [note that

neither the words ‘united’ nor ‘states’ began with capital letters] But the


[Corporate By-laws, i.e. Corporate Operational Policy], which is absolutely NOT

the same document you think it is. First of all, it ended all our rights of

sovereignty [sui juris]. So you now have the “HOW”, of how the international

bankers got their hands on THE uNITED sTATES OF AMERICA.”

To fully understand how our rights of sovereignty were ended, you must

know the full meaning of sovereign: “Chief or highest, supreme power, superior in

position to all others; independent of and unlimited by others; possessing or

entitled to; original and independent authority or jurisdiction.” (Webster).

In short, our government, which was created by and for us as sovereigns

— free citizens deemed to have the highest authority in the land – was stolen

from us, along with our rights. Keep in mind that, according to the original

Constitution, only We the People are sovereign. Government is not sovereign. The

Declaration of Independence says: “…government is subject to the consent of the

governed.” That’s us –we are the sovereigns. When did you last feet like a

sovereign? As Lisa Guliani explained:

“It doesn’t take a rocket scientist or a constitutional historian

to figure out that the U.S. Government has NOT been subject to the consent of the

governed since long before you or I were born. Rather, the governed are subject

to the whim and greed of the corporation, which has stretched its tentacles

beyond the ten-mile-square parcel of land known as the District of Columbia. In

fact, it has invaded every state of the Republic. Mind you, the corporation has

NO jurisdiction beyond the District of Columbia. You just think it does.

“You see, you are ‘presumed’ to know the law, which is very

weird, since We the People are taught NOTHING about the law in school. We

memorize obscure facts and phrases here and there, like the Preamble, which says,

‘We the People…establish this Constitution for the united states of America.’ But

our teachers only gloss over the Bill of Rights. Our schools (controlled by the

corporate government) don’t delve into the Constitution at depth. After all,

the corporation was established to indoctrinate and ‘dumb-down’ the masses, not

to teach anything of value or importance. Certainly, no one mentioned that

America was sold-out to foreign interests, that we were beneficiaries of the debt

incurred by Congress, or that we were in debt to the International Bankers. Yet,

for generations, Americans have had the bulk of their earnings confiscated to pay

a massive debt that they did not incur. There’s an endless stream of things the

People aren’t told. And, now that you are being told, how do you feel about being

made the recipient of a debt without your knowledge or consent?

“After passage of the Act of 1871 Congress set a series of subtle

and overt deceptions into motion, deceptions in the form of decisions that were

meant to sell us down the river. Over time, the Republic took it on the chin

until it was knocked down and counted out by a technical KO [knock out]. With the

surrender of the people’s gold in 1933, the ‘common herd’ was handed over to

illegitimate law. (I’ll bet you weren’t taught THAT in school.)

“Our corporate form of governance is based on Roman Civil Law and

Admiralty, or Maritime Law, which is also known as the ‘Divine Right of Kings’

Page 24


and the ‘Law of the Seas’ — another fact of American history not taught in our

schools. Actually, Roman Civil Law was fully established in the colonies before

our nation began, and then became managed by private international law. In other

words, the government — the government created for the District of Columbia via

the Act of 1871 – operates solely under Private International Law, not Common

Law, which was the foundation of our Constitutional Republic.

“This fact has impacted all Americans in concrete ways. For

instance, although Private International Law is technically only applicable

within the District of Columbia, and NOT in the other states of the Union, the

arms of the Corporation of the UNITED STATES are called ‘departments’ — i.e.,

the Justice Department, the Treasury Department. And those departments affect

everyone, no matter where (in what state) they live. Guess what? Each department

belongs to the corporation — to the UNITED STATES.

“Refer to any UNITED STATES CODE (USC). Note the capitalization;

this is evidence of a corporation, not a Republic. For example, In Title 28 3002

(15) (A) (B) (C), it is unequivocally stated that the UNITED STATES is a

corporation. Translation: the corporation is NOT a separate and distinct entity;

it is not disconnected from the government; it IS the government — your

government. This is extremely important! I refer to it as the ‘corporate EMPIRE

of the UNITED STATES,’ which operates under Roman Civil Law outside the original

Constitution. How do you like being ruled by a corporation? You say you’ll ask

your Congressperson about this? HA!! “Congress is fully aware of this deception.

So it’s time that you, too, become aware of the deception. What this great

deception means is that the members of Congress do NOT work for us, for you and

me. They work for the Corporation, for the UNITED STATES. No wonder we can’t get

them to do anything on our behalf, or meet our demands, or answer our questions.

“Technically, legally, or any other way you want to look at the

matter, the corporate government of the UNITED STATES has no jurisdiction or

authority in ANY State of the Union (the Republic) beyond the District of

Columbia. Let that tidbit sink in, then ask yourself, could this deception have

occurred without full knowledge and complicity of the Congress? Do you think it

happened by accident? If you do, you’re deceiving yourself.

“There are no accidents, no coincidences. Face the facts and

confront the truth. Remember, you are presumed to know the law. THEY know you

don’t know the law or, for that matter, your history. Why? Because no concerted

effort was ever made to teach or otherwise inform you. As a Sovereign, you are

entitled to full disclosure of all facts. As a slave, you are entitled to nothing

other than what the corporation decides to ‘give’ you.

“Remember also that ‘Ignorance of the law is no excuse.’ It’s

your responsibility and obligation to learn the law and know how it applies to

you. No wonder the corporation counted on the fact that most people are too

indifferent, unconcerned, distracted, or lazy to learn what they need to know to

survive within the system. We have been conditioned to let the government do our

thinking for us. Now’s the time to turn that around if we intend to help save our

Republic and ourselves — before it’s too late.

“As an instrument of the international bankers, the UNITED STATES

owns you from birth to death. It also holds ownership of all your assets, of your

property, even of your children. Think long and hard about all the bills taxes,

fines, and licenses you have paid for or purchased. Yes, they had you by the

pockets. If you don’t believe it, read the 14th Amendment. See how ‘free’ you

really are. Ignorance of the facts led to your silence. Silence is construed as

consent; consent to be beneficiaries of a debt you did not incur. As a Sovereign

People we have been deceived for hundreds of years; we think we are free, but in

truth we are servants of the corporation.

“Congress committed treason against the People in 1871. Honest

men could have corrected the fraud and treason. But apparently there weren’t

enough honest men to counteract the lust for money and power. We lost more

freedom than we will ever know, thanks to corporate infiltration of our so-called


“Do you think that any soldier who died in any of our many wars

Page 25


would have fought if he or she had known the truth? Do you think one person would

have laid down his/her life for a corporation? How long will we remain silent?

How long will we perpetuate the MYTH that we are free? When will we stand

together as One Sovereign People? When will we take back what has been stolen

from the US?

“If the People of America had known to what extent their trust

was betrayed, how long would it have taken for a real revolution to occur? What

we now need is a Revolution in THOUGHT. We need to change our thinking; then we

can change our world. Our children deserve their rightful legacy — the liberty

our ancestors fought to preserve, the legacy of a Sovereign and Fully Free


From a speech in Congress:

The Bankruptcy of The United States, in United States Congressional

Record, March 17, 1993 Vol. 33, page H-1303 Speaker-Rep. James Traficant, Jr.

(Ohio) addressing the House:

“Prior to 1913, most Americans owned clear, allodial title to property,

free and clear of any liens or mortgages until the Federal Reserve Act (1913)

“Hypothecated” all property within the federal United States to the Board of

Governors of the Federal Reserve, -in which the Trustees (stockholders) held

legal title. The U.S. citizen (tenant, franchisee) was registered as a

“beneficiary” of the trust via his/her birth certificate. In 1933, the federal

United States hypothecated all of the present and future properties, assets and

labor of their “subjects,” the 14th Amendment U.S. citizen, to the Federal

Reserve System.

In return, the Federal Reserve System agreed to extend THE FEDERAL United

States CORPORATION [emphasis added] all the credit “money substitute” it needed.

Like any other debtor, the federal United States government had to assign

collateral and security to their creditors as a condition of the loan. Since the

Federal United States didn’t have any assets, they assigned the private property

of their “economic slaves”, the U.S. citizens as collateral against the

un-payable federal debt. They also pledged the unincorporated federal

territories, national parks forests, birth certificates, and nonprofit

organizations, as collateral against the federal debt. All have already been

transferred as payment to the international bankers.

Unwittingly, America has returned to its pre-American Revolution feudal

roots whereby all land is held by a sovereign, and the common people had no

rights to hold allodial title to property. Once again, We the People are the

tenants and sharecroppers renting our own property from a Sovereign in the guise

of the Federal Reserve Bank. We the people have exchanged one master for


My conscience has been pricked. I have been lead to investigate the

record of the days in which the forms of government in my native land were set

down. I have looked diligently into the scriptures and considered carefully the

clear statements of many of the number of good and wise men in our faith on these

issues, some of which I have included in footnotes. I have a family, Sir, who

are depending on me to rightly divide for them the truth. Can I turn my back on

these revelations and go on as if nothing is wrong? I do not think so!!

But these “…awful situation(s),” that have caused us to get into this

terrible state, have been created. I explained one of the keys earlier, which is

that the country is bankrupt and we have no rights. The United States bankruptcy

is a direct result of the Federal Reserve Act of December 23, 1913, in which the

delegated authority of Congress, to be responsible for the nation’s currency, was

illicitly, unconstitutionally and treasonously surrendered to the privately owned

Federal Reserve Corporation (a foreign agent), whose class “A” stockholders are

various international banks whose boards rarely saw any American service or have

any say in the decisions made by them which affected the fiscal policy touching

every American family. This is an unconstitutional act as there has never been a

Constitutional amendment passed to change Article I, Section 8, Clause 5 of the


Page 26


It was spearheaded by Paul Warburg who had married Nina Leob, daughter of

Solomon Leob of Kuhn-Leob and Company, America’s most powerful international

banking firm. Felix Warburg married Frieda Schiff, daughter of Jacob Schiff, the

ruling power behind Kuhn-Leob. In the eighteenth century the Schiffs and

Rothschilds shared a double house in Frankfort, Germany. Schiff reportedly

bought his partnership in Kuhn-Leob with Rothschild money. It was confirmed by

the New York Journal American of February 3, 1949, that Jacob Schiff gave 20

million in gold to help the final triumph of the Bolshevik Revolution. Our

Forefathers had seen these banker’s workings in Europe and totally opposed their

activities. Thomas Jefferson kicked them out of the country calling them “…a

den of vipers and thieves.” Both Paul and Felix Warburg became partners in

Kuhn-Leob. Paul Warburg first “influenced” a Senator from the State of Rhode

Island, a Mason, by the name of Nelson Aldrich. This is Nelson Rockerfeller’s

maternal grandfather. Nelson Aldrich first introduced this act as the Aldrich

Bill [National Reserve Association] in 1911. It was defeated. It was

reintroduced in 1913 with some minor changes by Rep. Carter Glass. It was passed

on December 23, 1913, (when everyone that wasn’t bought and paid for was home

having Christmas with their families) under a minority quorum. When Senator

Aldrich entered the Senate in 1881, he was worth $50,000. When he left the

senate in 1911, he was worth $30,000,000.

Woodrow Wilson was the sole property of Jacob Schiff and J.P. Morgan and other

international bankers. But the man who was really running things in the White

House was the mysterious “Col.” Edward Mandel House during Wilson’s term in

office. It was House and the internationalist bankers who promoted Wilson as the

Presidential Candidate. Woodrow Wilson was the 28th President of the US. But it

was House who converted Wilson to accept the principles of the centralization of

the US Monetary System.

It was House that helped promote the Presidential candidacy of Franklin D.

Roosevelt. It was Franklin D. Roosevelt who gave the Communists East Germany and

Eastern Europe. And it was Edward Mandel House, under the watchful eye of Jacob

Schiff, who was under the watchful eye of the HEAD of this international

conspiracy that reestablished in 1921 what their earlier comrades established, to

overthrow the governments of France and Russia.

Congressman Charles Lindberg, Sr. warned the American people that the

Federal Reserve Act:

“…established the most gigantic trust on earth. When the President signs this

act, the invisible government by the money power…will be legitimized. The new

law will create inflation whenever the trusts want inflation. From now on,

depressions will be scientifically created.”

In place of real, lawful money (gold and silver coin) as legal tender,

the Federal Reserve issued private commercial paper, drawn on the credit of the

united states, consisting only of bookkeeping entries of no substance or reality,

on which compound interest is charged and is to be repaid in labor and substance.

[Military scrip by function] The U.S. Treasury paid the ever-increasing interest

in gold and was eventually depleted, with a higher debt than ever. The planned

inevitability occurred: BANKRUPTCY.

In Congress, in 1934, Congressman McFadden also testified that:

“On April 27,1932, the Fed outfit sent $750,000 belonging to American bank

depositors in gold to Germany. A week later another $300,000 in gold was shipped

to Germany. About the middle of May $12,000,000 was shipped to Germany by the

Fed. Almost every week there is a shipment of gold to Germany.”

I’d like to hear someone’s explanation of how this was good for America to have

these private bankers move our assets and birthright to a foreign land. I wonder

where Germany got all their money to finance their wars.

When a government declares bankruptcy it looses its Sovereignty. In 1933

the U. S. declared bankruptcy, as expressed in President Roosevelt’s Executive

Orders #6073, #6102, #6111 & #6260. In Perry v. U.S., the Supreme Court stated

that House Joint Resolution 192 of June 5, 1933, signified the United States had

Page 27


repudiated, dishonored and disavowed its own notes and obligations, i.e. declared

bankruptcy. The United States has continued ever since to repudiate, dishonor,

and disavow its obligations, thereby dissolving the governmental structure. It

then becomes a collection agency for its creditors. And that collection agency,

by all that defines such a business, is a corporation; utilizing the world’s most

well equipped military to assist the actions of repossession, its Congressionally

approved agencies may order. By doing so, while attempting to bypass the law, it

can have no remedy at law, relief in equity or claim in any body of law

whatsoever. As a bankrupt, insolvent entity the “United States” has no standing

to sue at law or equity or bring any civil or criminal action against anyone.

Thus, neither can any of the “residents” or “citizens” thereof.

Also, by becoming a corporation a government lays down its sovereignty

and takes on the position of a private citizen. It can exercise no power, which

is not derived from the corporate charter. The real party in interest is not the

de Jure “united states of America” or “State”, but “The Bank” and “The Fund.”

The acts committed under fraud, force and seizures are many times done under

“Letters of Marquee and Reprisal” i.e. “recapture.”

The Creditors of the bankrupt, insolvent “United States” are the

International Monetary Fund (the “Fund”) and the International Bank of

Reconstruction & Development (the “Bank”), and are artificial, fictitious

entities. These operate under “…jurisdictions foreign to our land and

unacknowledged by our Laws…” and are operating inside our Country (America) in

violation of the Law of Nations, the U. N. Charter, the Constitution for the

united states of America, the Criminal Laws of the United States, the

Constitution for the State of California, and the Criminal Laws of California.

Said Foreign Creditors/Principals are in violation of all valid law and

devoid of all lawful standing in any court of the united states of America. The

Foreign Creditors/Principals have not declared their foreign law, will not

declare their foreign law, and are thereby perpetrating fraud pursuant to 18 USC

1001, and are violating the full disclosure, clean hands, grace, etc., required

by the Uniform Commercial Code, thereby violating the UCC in its entirety. In

other words, government by administrative policy and executive edicts, made

decisions in secret and more often than not, nowadays, executed those decisions

in secret as well. The Star Chamber is alive and well, but now it prowls our

Land instead of England’s.

The bankrupt United States is merely an alter ego of the instrumentality

of the “Bank” and the “Fund,” having in 1950 transferred all functions of the de

jure Treasury of the united states of America over to the Governor of the World

Bank and IMF, and is devoid of all sovereign character.

The “Secretary of Treasury” is the “Receiver” in the bankruptcy. The

“United States Government” is now merely a front for the “Sovereign Creditors,”

the Federal Reserve. The U.S. Attorney General is the “Permanent Member” to the

Secretariat of the Interpol Operation, and the Secretary of Treasury, the

“Alternate Permanent Member.” Under Article 30 of the “Constitution and General

Regulations of Interpol,” the agents are required to renounce their allegiance to

their respective countries and expatriate.

If “Public Officials” represent the actual United States Government

(which is a bankrupt entity that has no authority to prosecute any criminal or

civil matters), they are acting on behalf of a “civilly dead” entity, are devoid

of authority, and are engaging in treason by having sworn to protect and uphold

the Constitution while enforcing the rules of, and collecting revenue for,

Foreign Principals. If “officials” are properly empowered, they have expatriated

and are operating under delegations of authority from Interpol, the United

Nations, and who knows what other secret entities. It is worthy to note that an

Attorney/Representative is required to file a “Foreign Agents Registration

Statement,” if representing the interests of a Foreign Principal or Power.

It is to be further observed that the “Agreement” regarding the

Headquarters District of the United Nations was NOT agreed to, and is illegally

in the Country in the first instant.

The scriptures say a man cannot serve two masters, and if their

Page 28


delegation of authority is coming from these internationalist entities, they

certainly cannot be operating under a delegation of authority from We the People

at the same time. If they have expatriated they are also guilty of treason,

since they have sworn oaths to uphold the Constitution. They represent

themselves as “citizens” of the united states and Officials of a State or Federal

Government, while in fact they serve said Foreign Principles in the Silent

Weapons conspiracy to plunder, bankrupt, subjugate and conquer the American


Under the trappings of “democracy,” “the flag,” “law and order,” the

Constitution, etc., Americans have been duped into administering and submitting

to their own subjugation, bankruptcy, enslavement and the elimination of their

rights, freedom, Country and most important of all, the biblical form of

jurisprudence handed down to us from Moses. The people have been reduced to

peonage and involuntary servitude under a fraudulent, tyrannical and seditious

foreign oligarchy whose express intent is to institute and establish a feudal

style of fascism over the people and their posterity through a private,

commercial one-world-government (New World Order).

These Foreign Principals, through the knowing or unknowing complicity of

their agents (local, State, and Federal “Officials”) have completely debauched

the money system, destroyed the lives and livelihoods of millions of people,

aided and abetted the enemies of America and human freedom in general, declared a

secret war on the American people and their posterity, incited rebellion and

seditious foreign agreements, pacts, confederations, treaties, and alliances, and

under a pretense of “Emergency” (which they themselves created) have formed and

established a multitude of offices of alien allegiance to perpetuate their

plunder. Conquest and subjugation of what was once considered “the last great

hope of human freedom” is the clear object of their design. By continuing to

administer the perfidy, “public officials” are committing treason against not

only the Constitution, but against truth, rightness and the real Sovereigns of

the nation — the people themselves.

According to the research done in 16 American Jurisprudence, 2nd Edition,

Sections 71 & 82, no “Emergency” justifies a violation of any Constitutional

provision. Even considering the “Supremacy Clause” and “Separation of Powers,”

it is clearly admitted in Senate Report No. 93-549 that abridgment has occurred.

The statements heard in the Federal and State Tribunals, on numerous occasions,

that Constitutional arguments are “immaterial,” “frivolous” etc., is based upon

the concealment, furtherance and compounding of the Frauds and “Emergency”

created and sustained by the “Expatriated,” ALIENS of the United Nations and its

Organizations, Corporations and Associations.

The United States, thereafter, entered the Second World War during which

time the ”League of Nations” was re-instituted under the pretense of the “United

Nations” and the “Breton Woods Agreement.” The United States as a corporate body

politic (artificial) came out of World War II in worse economic shape than when

it entered, and in 1950 declared Bankruptcy; and “Reorganization.” These are the

conditions we’ve been talking of, and this Reorganization is located in Title 5

of the United States Codes Annotated. The United States went down the road and

has periodically filed for further Reorganization. Things and situations

worsened, having done what they were Commanded NOT to do.

Again, conditions worsened, and in 1965 Lyndon B. Johnson signed the

“Coinage act of 1965” completely debasing the Constitutional Coin [dollar]. At

the signing of this act, Johnson stated in his Press Release that:

“When I have signed this bill before me, we will have made the first fundamental

change in our coinage in 173 years. The coinage act of 1965 supersedes the act

of 1792. And the Act had the title: An Act Establishing a Mint and Regulating

the Coinage of the United States…”

“Now I will sign this bill to make the first change in our coinage system since

the 18th Century. To those members of Congress, who are here on this historic

occasion, I want to assure you that in making this change from the 18th Century,

we have no idea of returning to it.”

It is important to note here that there has never been a Constitutional

Amendment to fundamentally change, abridge or abolish the Constitutional

Page 29


mandates, provisions or prohibitions, but due to internal and external diversions

surrounding the Viet Nam War, etc., the usurpation and breach went basically

unchallenged and unnoticed by the general public at large, who became “…a

wealthy man’s cannon fodder, or cheap source of slave Labor.” Congress has

clearly delegated the Power and Authority to regulate and maintain the true and

inherent “value” of the coin within the scope and purview of Article I, Section

8, Clauses 5&6 and Article I, Section 10, Clause 1 of the Constitution, [1787]

and further, under a corresponding duty and obligation to maintain said gold and

silver coin and Foreign Coin at and within the necessary and proper “equal

weights and measures” clause.

Those exercising the offices of the several States, in equal measure,

knew such “De Facto Transactions” were unlawful and unauthorized, but sanctioned,

implemented and enforced the complete debauchment and the resulting

“governmental, social, industrial, economic change” in the “De Jure” states and

in the United States of America,and were and are now under the delusion that they

can do both directly and indirectly what they are absolutely prohibited from


In 1966, Congress, being severely compromised, passed the “Federal Tax

Lien Act of 1966,” by which the entire taxing and monetary system, i.e.

“Essential Engine,” was placed under the Uniform Commercial Code. The Uniform

Commercial Code was, of course, promulgated by the National Conference of

Commissioners on Uniform State Laws in collusion with the American Law Institute

for the “banking and business interests.” The United States being engaged in

numerous U.N. conflicts, including the Korean and the Viet Nam conflicts, which

were under direction of the United Nations, the U.S. agreeing to pay the bill,

and then not being able to honor their obligations and re-hypothecated debt

credit, openly and publicly dishonored and disavowed their “Notes” and

“Obligations,” i.e. “Federal Reserve Notes,” through Public Law 90-269, Section

2, 82 Stat. 50 (1968) to wit:

“Sec. 2. The first sentence of section 15 of the Federal Reserve

Act (12 U.S.C.391) is amended by striking ‘and the funds provided in this

Act for the redemption of Federal Reserve Notes.’”

Things steadily grew worse and on March 28, 1970, President Nixon issued

Proclamation No. 3972, declaring an “emergency” because the Postal Employees

struck against the “De Facto Government” for higher pay, due to inflation of the

paper “Bills of Credit.” Nixon placed the U.S. Postal Department under control

of the Department of Defense.

The system had been faltering for a decade, but the benchmark date of the

collapse is put at August 15, 1971. On this day, President Nixon reversed U.S.

international monetary policy by officially declaring the non-convertibility of

the U.S. dollar [F.R.N.] into gold. On September 21, 1973, Congress passed

Public Law 93-110, amending the Breton Woods “Par Value Modification Act,” and

reiterated the “Emergency” which also included “reports on foreign currency

transactions.” This Act further declared in Section 2(b) that:

“No provision of any law in effect on the date of enactment of this Act, and no

rule, regulation, or order under authority of any such law, may be construed to

prohibit any person from purchasing, holding, selling, or otherwise dealing with


On January 19, 1976, Marjorie S. Holt noted for the record, a second

“Declaration of INTER-dependence” and clearly identified the U.N. as a

“Communist” organization, and that they were seeking both production and monetary

control over the Union and People through International Organizations promoting

the One World Order.”

The decayed condition of the entire socio/economic system became very

apparent as noted in the Complaint/Petition, filed in the U.S. Court of Claims,

Docket No. 41-76, on February 11, 1976, by 44 Federal Judges, Atkins et al. v.

U.S. Atkins et al. complained that “As a result of inflation, the compensation

of Federal judges has been substantially diminished each year since 1969, causing

direct and continuing monetary harm to plaintiffs…the real value of the dollar

decreased by approximately 34.5 percent from March 15, 1969 to October, 1975…As

Page 30


a result, plaintiffs have suffered an unconstitutional deprivation of earnings.”

The prayer for relief claimed “damages for the constitutional violations

enumerated above, measured as the diminution of his earnings for the entire

period since March 9, 1969.” It is quite apparent that the persons holding and

enjoying Offices of Public Trust, Honor and/or profit knew of the emergent

problem and sought protection for themselves, to the damage and injury of the

People and their Children, who were classified as “a club that has many other

members” who “have no remedy.” And knowing that “heinous” acts had been

committed stated that they [judges/lawyers] would not apply the Law, nor would

any substantive remedy be applied [checked, more or less, but never stopped]

“until all of us [judges] are dead.” Such persons fraudulently swore an Oath to

uphold, defend and preserve the sovereignty of the Nation and the several

Republican States of the Union, and breached the Duty to Protect the

People/Citizens and their Posterity from Fraud, imposition, avarice and stealthy

encroachment. This is similar to the condition that Alma describes detailing how

the Judges in Ammonihah were paid, and the troubles they caused and created.

This financial instability is verified in Public Laws 94-564, Legislative

History, pg. 5944, which states:

“Moving to a floating exchange rate for international commerce means private

enterprise and not central governments bear the risk of currency fluctuations.”

Numerous serious debates were held in Congress, including, but not

limited to, Tuesday, July 27, 1976, concerning the International Financial

Institutions and its operations. Representative Ron Paul, Chairman of the House

Banking Committee, made numerous references to the true practices of the

“International” financial institutions, including, but not limited to the

conversion of $27,000,000 [27 million] in gold, contributed by the United States

as part of its “quota obligations,” which the International Monetary Fund

[Governor & Secretary of the Treasury] sold under some very questionable terms

and concessions.

On October 28, 1977, most banking institutions, including State banks,

were declared to be under direction and control of the corporate ‘’Governor” of

the International Monetary Fund. The Act declares, in part:

“(2) Section 10(a) of the Gold Reserve Act of 1934 (31 U.S.C. 822 a(b)) is

amended by striking out the phrase ‘…stabilizing the exchange value of the


(c) The joint resolution entitled ‘Joint resolution to assure uniform value to

the coins and currencies of the United States,’ approved June 5, 1933 (31 U.S.C.

463) shall not apply to obligations issued on or after the date of enactment of

this section.”

Once again, the United States as Corporation and “State” had declared

“Insolvency.” A permanent state of “Emergency” was instituted, formed and

erected within the Union through the contrivances, fraud and avarice of the

international Financial Institutions, Organizations, Corporations and

associations, including the Federal Reserve, their “Fiscal and Depository agent.”

This has led to such “Emergency” legislation as the “Public Debt Limit-Balance

Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985,” Public Law 99-177.

On March 17,1993, in the House of Representatives, Congressman Traficant


“Mr. Speaker, we are now here in Chapter 11. Members of Congress are official

trustees presiding over the greatest reorganization of any bankrupt entity in

world history, the U. S. Government.”

One should take notice that a Chapter 11 is a corporate bankruptcy. A

Corporation is not now, nor ever will be a “…Republican form of government…”

Several of our forefathers and Church leaders foresaw many of these

conditions and counseled us in this manner:

“It is said in the Doctrine and Covenants, ‘…that he that keepeth the laws of

Page 31


God hath no need to break the laws of the land.’ It is further explained in

Section 98, what is meant in relation to this: That all laws, which are

Constitutional, must be obeyed.

“And now, verily I say unto you concerning the laws of the land, it is my will

that my people should observe to do all things whatsoever I command them. And

that the law of the land, which is Constitutional, supporting that principle of

freedom in maintaining rights and privileges, belongs to all mankind, and is

justifiable before me;

‘Therefore, I the Lord justify you and your brethren of the Church in befriending

that law which is the Constitutional law of the land. And as pertaining to laws

of man, whatsoever is more or less than these cometh of evil. I, the Lord God,

make you free, therefore ye are free indeed; and the law also maketh you free.

Nevertheless, when the wicked rule, the people mourn.’ ”

“That is, taking this Nation for an example, all laws that are proper and

correct, and all obligations entered into, which are not violative of the

Constitution should be kept inviolate. But, if they are violative of the

Constitution, then the compact between the rulers and the ruled is broken and the

obligation ceases to be binding. Just as a person agreeing to purchase anything

and to pay a certain amount for it, if he receives the article bargained for, and

does not pay its price, has violated his contract. But if he does not receive

the article bargained for, he is not required to pay for it.”

President George Albert Smith further counseled us:

“There are those who would destroy the Constitution of this land, and there are

those who would rejoice if they could overthrow this nation. No loyal member of

this great Church will raise his voice against the Constitutional law of the

land, but he will be found upholding it; he will be found praying for those who

make the laws under the Constitution. He will petition his Father in heaven for

all those who are chosen from time to time to administer the laws that are

calculated to continue unto us our liberty, that they may be wise and just

examples to the people.

Upon you, men of Israel — to whom the priesthood of the Holy One has been given

— there rests an obligation. You must serve the Lord and keep his commandments.

It matters not what others may do, but for you there is only one course, and

that is to sustain the Constitution of this great land, and to sustain those

influences and powers, whatever they may be, that are calculated to uplift the

human family. There should go forth from this great Church an influence intended

to leaven the whole lump.”

President Ezra Taft Benson said there are four things we must do to

protect and care for our divine freedoms:

“(1) We must be righteous… (2) We must learn the principles of the Constitution

and then abide by its precepts… (3) We must become involved in civic affairs…

(4) We must make our influence felt…”

He also said:

“The war that began in heaven is not yet over. The conflict continues on the

battlefield of mortality. And one of Lucifer’s primary strategies has been to

restrict our agency through the power of earthly governments.”

This brings us to a discussion of one of those restrictions. That being a

quasi-governmental agency known as the Internal Revenue Service. Or, the

Infernal Revenue Service, depending on your experience with them. The Internal

Revenue Service entered into a “service agreement” with the U.S. Treasury

Department and the Agency for International Development.

The Agency for International Development is an international paramilitary

operation that includes such activities as:

“Assumption of full or partial executive, legislative and judicial authority over

a country or area.”

Page 32


The International Organization’s intents, purposes and activities include

complete control of “Public Finance” i.e. “control, supervision and audit of

indigenous fiscal resources; budget practices, taxation, expenditures of public

funds, currency issues, banking agencies and affiliates.” This, of course,

complies with “Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars” which discloses a declaration of

war upon the American people, monetary control by the Internationalist, through

information etc. solicited and collected by the Internal Revenue Service, who is

operating and enforcing the seditious International program. The 1985 Edition of

the Department of Army Field Manual, further describes the International “Civil

Affairs” operations. At page 3-6 it is admitted that the A.I.D. is autonomous

and under direction of the International Development Cooperation Agency, and at

page 3-8 it says that the operation is “paramilitary.” This International

Organization’s intent and purpose was to promote, implement and enforce a


It appears from the documentary evidence that the Internal Revenue

Service Agents, etc., are “Agents of a Foreign Principal” within the meaning and

intent of the “Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938.” They are directed and

controlled by the corporate “Governor” of “The Fund” a/k/a “Secretary of

Treasury,” and the corporate “Governor” of “The Bank,” acting as

“Information-service employees,” and have been and do now “solicit, collect,

disburse or dispense contribution, loans, money, or other things of value for, or

in interest of, such foreign principal, and they entered into agreements with a

Foreign Principal pursuant to Treasury Delegation Order #91, i.e., the “Agency

For International Development.” The Internal Revenue Service is also an agency

of the International Criminal Police Organization, and solicits and collects

information for 150 Foreign Powers.

It should be further noted that Congress has appropriated, transferred

and converted vast sums to Foreign Powers, and has entered into numerous Foreign

Taxing Treaties, (conventions) and other Agreements, which are solicited and

collected pursuant to 26 I.R.C. 6103(k)(4). Along with other documentary

evidence, any further doubt as to the true character of the party should be

absolved. Such restrictions as “For the general welfare and common defense of

the united states” apparently aren’t applicable, and the fraudulent

re-hypothecated debt-credit will be merely added to the insolvent nature of the

continual “emergency,” and the reciprocal socio/economic repercussions laid upon

present and future generations.

Among other reasons for lack of authority to act, such as a Foreign

Agents Registration Statement, military authority cannot be imposed into civil

affairs. The United Nations Charter, Article 2, Section 7, further prohibits the

U.N. from “…intervening in matters which are essentially within the domestic

jurisdiction of any state…” However, Korea, Viet Nam, Ethiopia, Angola,

Kuwait, etc., etc., are evidence enough of the “Bad Faith” of the United Nations

and its Organizations, Corporations and Associations. Such is the “Rule of Law”

“as evidenced by the Founders” of the United Nations. Such is Communist

terrorism, despotism and tyranny. ALL WERE AND ARE OUTLAWED HERE.

You might also find it interesting that Treasury Delegation Order # 92

states that the I.R.S. is trained under direction of the Division of “Human

Resources” [U.N.] and the Commissioner [International], by the “Office of

Personnel Management.” In the 1979 Edition of 22 U.S.C.A., 287, The United

Nations, at pg. 248, you will find Executive Order # 10422. The Office of

Personnel Management is under the direction of the Secretary General of the

United Nations. And as stated previously, the I.R.S. is also a member in a one

hundred fifty-(150)-nation pact called the “International Criminal Police

Organization.” The “Memorandum & Agreement” between the Secretary of

Treasury/Corporate Governor of “The Fund” and “The Bank” and the office of the

U.S. Attorney General would indicate that the Attorney General and his Associates

are soliciting and collecting information for Foreign Principals.

A question has arisen concerning my “legal” requirement to file a tax

return. The I.R.S. claims that their authority (jurisdiction) comes from the

16th Amendment, because it changed the Constitutional limitations on direct

taxation without apportionment. To start with, the 16th Amendment is another

amendment that was never legally ratified. However, the U.S. Supreme Court

Page 33


rejected I.R.S.’s claim in cases such as BRUSHABER v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO.,

240 U.S. 1, 1916 and Stanton v. Baltic Mining Co., 240 U.S. 103, at page 112

(1916), in which the Supreme Court ruled that the 16th Amendment,

“…conferred NO NEW POWER of taxation but simply prohibited the previous

complete and plenary power of income taxation possessed by Congress, FROM THE

BEGINNING, from being taken out of the category of INDIRECT taxation to which it

inherently belonged…” [my emphasis],

and thus did not amend or change the Constitutional limitations, which forbid any

direct taxation of individuals. The court explained that since it is a tax

without apportionment, the income tax cannot be a direct tax, (a tax on

individuals or on property) because the Constitution still requires that all

direct taxes must be apportioned.

This means no income tax, State or Federal or Municipal, can be laid

against the individual free inhabitant, unless he volunteers to assess himself by

filing a return. Only then is he obligated to pay it. The only way he can be

compelled to do so is if he is involved in a regulated enterprise that has been

styled as such by the District of Columbia in the first instance. Some examples

are: stock brokerage, the tobacco trade, alcoholic distillation, arms businesses

abroad, nuclear power production, toxic waste disposal operations, etc. These

are referred to in the code as “revenue taxable activities [events or

incidents],” and demonstrate that these are indirect taxes, as the tax is levied

against the event and not on the fruits of one’s labors. In other words, the

code identifies the 80 plus particular taxes the code actually does have

jurisdiction over, the provisions for which are included within its text.

It also demonstrates that not everyone is to be a taxpayer. The free

exercise and enjoyment of the God-given, and Constitutionally secured, right to

lawfully acquire property or compensatory wages, by lawfully contracting one’s

own labor in innocent and harmless activities, for lawful compensation, cannot be

and should not be taxed for revenue purposes. Employment taxes are a separate

tax and are owed by the employer only, never by the employee.

Another portion of the ruling says that all income taxes in the United

States are excise taxes. Excise Taxes are defined as: an internal tax levied on

the manufacture, sale or consumption of a commodity within a “nation.” This is

consistent with rulings such as Flint v. Stone Tracey Co., but the Court made it

very clear that the tax was on the “privilege” of doing business pursuant to a

government granted license, or from corporate “privilege.” A business or a

corporation is always taxed on its NET (profit), not on its GROSS. Simms v.

Arehns ruled that income tax was neither a property tax nor a tax upon

occupations of common right, but an EXCISE TAX. Redfield v. Fisher, 292 Page 813

at 819 (1930), ruled that the individual, unlike the corporation, cannot be taxed

for the mere privilege of existing. THE INDIVIDUAL’S RIGHT TO LIVE AND OWN


Commissioner adds that Citizens are entitled by right to income or earnings and

that right cannot be taxed as a privilege. In US. v. Lloyd R. Long it was proven


“Nowhere in the entire IRS Code is anyone but an employer actually made liable

for an income tax on employees.”

They testified that this was not an oversight by showing that the Alcohol

Tax was worded so clearly that no one could misinterpret the meaning. A

statement from the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax Division of the IRS shows that income

tax (for employees – 26 USC) is 100% voluntary, as opposed to the Alcohol Tax

(Title 27 USC), which is 100% mandatory. Alcohol and tobacco are produced under

the privilege of a government granted license, and, therefore, the profit from

their production, sales or consumption is taxable as an EXCISE. Thus we see

where the IRS gets their authority. The scope of authority for collection in

Title 26 (I.R.S. Code) is very limited and then only income that falls under

control of a government granted license or regulated enterprise.

Authority is given in Title 27, U.S.C.A. (Alcohol, Tobacco and Fire Arms)

Page 34


for those that are mandatory. Is your “income,” as an employee, pursuant to a

government granted license? If your employment is in conjunction with alcohol,

tobacco, firearms, military contracts, foreign insurance, investment activities,

toxic waste disposal etc., it may very well be one of those identified as one of

the regulated activities. If not, it is not, under the law, a “revenue taxable

activity” reportable upon and against the employee. And thus we see that there

is no REQUIREMENT under the law for most employees to file a tax return, unless

the income is derived from activities in one of the above categories.

The Mission Statement of the IRS: “…is to encourage and achieve the highest

degree of voluntary compliance…” IRS Code says that you have an “election” to

volunteer. Reciprocally, “Each agreement shall contain provisions for its

possible termination.” Also, the 5th Amendment declares that: “…no person

shall…be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.” So

the amendment states that you cannot be compelled to be a witness and give

information about yourself, whether or not such information is incriminating.

This means that under no circumstances can the government require you to provide

it with information, which it can use against you for an alleged violation of a

civil or criminal statute. (Although the 5th Amendment mentions only “criminal

matters,” the Supreme Court, in McCarthy v. Arndstein, ruled that the 5th

Amendment “…applies alike to criminal and civil proceedings.”) Obviously this

information can be used to fine you, penalize you, make you pay interest and even

to prosecute you. What does this have to do with your tax return? It is

precisely the 5th Amendment that bars the Federal Government from requiring you

to file a tax return, since any information on a tax return can be used against

you. This fact is clearly recognized by a United States court of appeals in

1926, in the case of Sullivan v. United States, as follows: “There can be no

question that one who files a return under oath is a witness within the meaning

of the Amendment.” In 1976, the United States Supreme Court reiterated this when

it held in Garner v. United States: “The information revealed in the preparation

and filing of an income tax return is, the testimony of a “witness” as the term

is used herein.” The United States Government cannot require that anyone be a

witness against himself within the meaning of the 5th Amendment. It is only

because the information on a tax return is considered to have been given

voluntarily that the government can use it against individuals in criminal and

civil cases. This then, is proof that the information you give on your tax

return is voluntary. Can the government ever require you to be a witness against

yourself? NO! “The 5th Amendment provision that the individual cannot be

compelled to be a witness against himself cannot be abridged.” Miranda v Arizona

Congress cannot pass a law, tax or otherwise, that infringes upon your 5th

Amendment right. In the Miranda decision, the Supreme Court went on to say:

“Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no

rule-making or legislation which would abrogate them.” You cannot be required to

submit to an IRS audit because it is also part of “voluntary” compliance. The

government cannot use compelled testimony against you in a court of law, so if

the government requires you to turn over your books and records to the IRS, it

cannot use any of that information against you — not even in matters relating to

income tax evasion, levying of fines and penalties, or criminal offenses

unrelated to taxes. The IRS conducts audits to get information about anything

you’re doing that might be illegal — so it can have the Justice Department

prosecute you. But to do that, the material must be obtained voluntarily! Look

at this excerpt from the IRS’s “Handbook For Special Agents: “An individual may

refuse to exhibit his books and records for examination on the ground that

compelling him to do so might violate his right against self-incrimination under

the 5th Amendment and constitute an illegal search and seizure under the 4th

Amendment.” Submitting to an audit means waiving your Constitutional Rights.

You might think that even if you submitted to an audit, you’d be able to claim

your right not to be a witness against yourself later, at a trial perhaps. Think

Again!! The IRS Handbook goes on to say: “The privilege against

self-incrimination must be specifically claimed or it will be considered to have

been waved (UCC 1-207.4). In the Nicola case, the taxpayer permitted a revenue

agent to examine his books and records. The taxpayer was indicted for income tax

evasion and invoked his Constitutional rights under the 5th Amendment for the

first time at the trial, by objecting to the revenue agent’s testimony concerning

his findings. But the court said, “…it was necessary for him to claim immunity

before the government agent (UCC 1-207.4) and refuse to produce his books. (UCC

1-207.7) After the government agent had gotten possession of the information

with his consent, it was too late for him to claim Constitutional immunity.” (UCC

Page 35


1-207.9) [my emphasis] Remember that you have been placed in commerce and they

are treating you as a commercial entity. The section of the IRS Code they use to

charge you with is a section that deals with licensed securities brokers. And,

yes, they, by law, are required to keep books and furnish them on demand for

audit. They work pursuant to a “Government” granted license.

The Supreme Court has never allowed congress to define “income”, but Court

rulings like Flint v. Stone Tracey Co. consistently show that you have been

placed in commerce. A business is not taxed on its base capital, but on profit.

What one receives as wages and earnings in a common occupation is compensation

(exchange, Black’s Law Dictionary) for his property (his time), and is “base

capital” not “income” and is not, according to the courts, taxable. If one

invests his “base capital” in a savings account and produces interest “income”;

or in bonds and produces dividend “income”; or in Real Estate and makes capital

gains “income” then he has “income” that is reportable in accordance with Flint

v. Stone Tracey Co. And only if it is above a certain amount under IRS Code is

one then required to file a tax return.

Now I’ve shown you what TAX LAW is according to the Supreme Court, who’s

job it is to interpret the Constitution and the Laws. Let’s not confuse that

with IRS Code, [Title 26 USC] which would better be understood as a set of their

“rules to play by,” if we’ve signed one of their “voluntary” contracts. When one

files a tax return he/she is voluntarily declaring himself/herself a citizen of

the District of Columbia (United States citizen) and his/her income as corporate

privilege (excise income). Remember that the Government (Corporation) also

enjoys the unlimited right to contract as afforded in the Constitution.

Title 26 (I.R.S. Code) defines who it has jurisdiction over. I am not

one of them. I’m not a “resident” of the District of Columbia (alieni Juris) or

any of its protectorate States; or subordinate enclaves. I don’t live or work on

or in a government enclave; I don’t derive any “income” from “revenue taxable

activities” “within the District of Columbia;” I am not a member of the “body

politic” of the District of Columbia, nor am I in the military. Since I have

filed the proper documentation under the UCC making a reservation of my rights, I

am outside both the venue and jurisdiction of Title 26 USC. I am not a

privileged, Fourteenth Amendment, Federal, United States citizen, and I never

really have been according to clear statements of the Law I have quoted at length

in the above. In other words, I am no longer “subject to the jurisdiction” of

the Corporate United States. Technically, as far as the District of Columbia is

concerned, I am in the same category as any “Nonresident Alien,” with respect to

the United States Government. I am foreign to the United States Government

[District of Columbia] and native to my home Country – the Republic on the land

[of the 50 Sovereign States]. It is a principle of Law that, once challenged,

the person and/or governmental agency(ies) asserting (colorable) jurisdiction (in

personam), must prove that jurisdiction to exist as matter of law, i.e., Article

6 of the “Bill of Rights” – “…nature and cause…”

I have established my position, in the example below, of an affidavit given to

United States Government agencies in order that they might have notice and

opportunity to correct their records as follows:


For the purpose of this Affidavit, the terms “United States” and “U.S.” means

ONLY the Federal Legislative Democracy of the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico,

U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa and any other Territory within the

“United States,” which entity has its origin and jurisdiction in Article I,

Section 8, Clauses 17-18 and Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2 of the Constitution

for the United States of America. The terms “United States” and “U.S.” are NOT to

be construed to mean or include the sovereign, united 50 states of America.

Neither born nor naturalized in the “United States” nor “subject to its

jurisdiction,” I am NOT and never have been, as described in 26 CFR 1.1-1(c) and

the 14th Amendment, a “U.S. citizen.” Therefore I AM AN “ALIEN” with respect to

the “United States.”

I am NOT and never have been, as described in 26 USC 865(g)(1)(A), a “resident of

the U.S.”

Page 36


I have NEVER made, with ANY “knowingly intelligent acts” (Brady v. U.S., 397 U.S.

742,748), ANY voluntary election under 26 USC 6013 or 26 CFR 1.871-4 to be

treated as a “U.S. resident alien” for any purpose. Further, I have utterly NO

intention of making any such election in the future.

I AM, as described in 26 USC 865(g)(1)(B), a “nonresident” of the “United


I am NOT and never have been, as described in 26 USC 7701(a)(30), a ”U.S.


I am NOT and never have been, as described in 26 USC 7701(a)(14), a “taxpayer.”

I do NOT have and have never had, as described in 26 USC 911(d)(3), a “tax home

within the U.S.”

I AM therefore, as described in 26 CFR 1.871-2 and 26 USC 7701(b), a “nonresident

alien” with respect to the “United States,” and am outside the general venue and

jurisdiction of the “U.S.”

I am NOT and never have been, as described in 26 USC 3401, an “officer,” or an

“employee,” or an “elected official” (of the “United States,” of a “State” or of

any political subdivision thereof, nor of the District of Columbia, nor of a

“domestic” corporation) earning wages from an “employer.”

I am NOT and never have been, as described in 31 USC 3713, a “fiduciary,” or as

described in 26 USC 6901, a “transferee” or a “transferee of a transferee.”

I am NOT and never have been, as described in 26 USC Subtitle B, a “donor” or a

“contributor,” and, as a “nonresident alien” excluded under 26 USC 2501(a)(2), I

am EXEMPT from any gift tax under 26 USC Subtitle B.

As a “nonresident alien” NOT engaged in or effectively connected with any “trade

or business within the United States” I an NOT REQUIRED by law to obtain a “U.S.”

Taxpayer Identification Number or a Social Security Number because of my

exemption under 26 CFR 301.6109-1(g). Further, I am NOT REQUIRED by law to make,

as described in 26 CFR 1.6015(a)-1, a “declaration,” because I am exempt under

26CFR 1.601.5(i)-1 and fundamental law.

As a “nonresident alien,” I have NO “self-employment income” (see 26 CFR


As a “nonresident alien,” I derive NO “gross income…from sources within the

United States,” – either “effectively connected” or “not effectively connected

with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States,” as described in 26

USC 872(a).

As a “nonresident alien,” my private-sector remuneration: is “from sources

without the United States,” as described in 26 CFR 1.1441-3(a), does NOT

constitute 26 USC 3401 “wages,” and is therefore NOT “subject to” mandatory

withholding (under 26 USC 3402(a), 3101(a), or 26 CFR 1.1441-1) because of this

EXEMPTION under 26 USC 3401(a)(6) and fundamental law.

As a “nonresident alien,” I did NEVER intentionally make, with ANY “knowingly

intelligent acts,” ANY voluntary withholding “agreement” as described in 26 USC


As a “nonresident alien,” my income is NOT includible in “gross income” under

Subtitle A and is EXEMPT from withholding according to 26 CFR 1.441-3(a) and 26

CFR 31.3401(a)(6)-1(b).

As a “nonresident alien,” with NO income “from sources within the United States,”

my private-sector non-“U.S.” income is FREE from all federal tax under

fundamental law (see Treasury Decisions 3146 and 3640, and United States v.

Morris, 125 F. Rapt. 322-331).

As a “nonresident alien,” my estate and/or trust is, as described in 26 USC

7701(a), a “TAX-EXEMPT “foreign estate or trust.”

Page 37


As a “natural born Citizen” (see II:I:5 of the Constitution), free Sovereign,

American Citizen and “nonresident alien” with respect to the federal United

States.” I did NEVER voluntarily intentionally waive, with ANY “knowingly

intelligent acts” ANY of my unalienable rights, and have utterly No intention of

doing so in the future. Any prima facie evidence or presumption to the contrary

is hereby rebutted. Any past signatures on IRS and SSA forms, statements, etc.

were in error and involuntarily made under threat, duress and coercion. I hereby

revoke, cancel and render void, Nunc Pro Tunc, both currently and retroactively

to the time of signing, any and all such signatures. I reserve my Common Law

right not to be compelled to perform under any agreement that I have not entered

into knowingly, voluntarily and intentionally.

I am not a 26 USC 7203 “person required.” I am a non-taxpayer outside both

general and tangential venue and jurisdiction of Title 26, United States Code.

Pursuant to 28 USC 1746(1) and executed “without the United States,” I affirm

under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the

foregoing is true and correct, to the best of my belief and informed knowledge.

Further This Affiant Saith Not.

The contracts that were used to bind me to that jurisdiction are null and

void on the grounds of both Fraud and Constructive Fraud. Remember that Congress

is working for the District of Columbia and that:

“Congress may provide its own definition for the terms used. The diligent

student should be aware of a number of general definitions contained in I.R.C.

(26 U.S.C.A.) Section 7701.”

We must expect that this secret combination of the practitioners of

deceit, who foist these miss-applications of law upon us at every opportunity,

will make small changes in the meaning of words that we think we know the

definitions of, in order to ensnare us. The “stealthy encroachment” is not

limited to merely keeping us all in the dark, but also is designed to prevent us

from freeing ourselves from the effects of the ignorance once we study these

things and learn what the law really says. And, sad to say, one of their main

methods for keeping “…us nigers from runnin’ off de’ plantation once we knows

what freedom is…” is to enlist the help of those around us who have yet to

truly read the law, as it reads, without the help of the media spin doctors. And

we get ourselves in deeper because, without verifying the facts, we do tend to

soak up those large chunks of bait like: “We must all pay our fair share…”

And, since there is no statute of limitations on fraud, these contracts I

spoke of earlier are invalid ab initio, which means: “as if they never existed

from the beginning.” Thus, as of the first contract I was induced to sign, fraud

took place. Another rule of law is that fraud cancels everything from the

beginning. As if the fraud wasn’t bad enough, I also was pressured into signing

that first contract of adhesion because of the coercion of my employers. This is

not the only legal reason they are null and void. Even if I would have been

given full disclosure, these contracts, in order to follow the tax code as

explained in the above, must be predicated upon some sort of regulated enterprise

or government grant of privilege. Since they are based upon the Social Security

application — The SS-5 — and that contract was likewise consummated by

concealment of material facts, necessary for a competent meeting of the minds, it

too is void for fraud and lack of full disclosure. That application is invalid

not only because of constructive fraud, but because contract law and minimum age

laws state that “…a minor has no capacity to fulfill a contract.” I was a minor

when these contracts were thrust upon me, under the guise that I would then have

money (forced savings) to take care of my needs when I reached retirement age.

This is also a violation of the UCC, i.e., clean hands, grace, full disclosure,


So why would one not want to be included within this system? Consider

the definition of FRAUD, as defined in 37 AM JUR 2nd, sections 144 and 145, as it

is relevant to the present situation. Understanding the full ramifications of

the meaning of the word regarding the current practices (involving felonious

denial of God-given RIGHTS, extortion of my property, etc., supra “under color of

Law”) can be very helpful in liberating our minds from the effects of years of

Page 38


mis-information, as follows:

Section 144: Unquestionably the concealment of material facts that one, under

the circumstances, is bound to disclose may constitute fraud. Indeed, one of the

fundamental tenants of the Anglo-Saxon Law of Fraud is that fraud may be

committed by a suppression of the truth (suppressio veri) as well as by the

suggestion of falsehood (suppressio falsi).

Section 145: The principle of the Law of Fraud, as it relates to non-disclosure,

is that a charge of fraud is maintainable where one knows the material facts and

is duty bound, under the circumstances, to speak and disclose his information but

remains silent.

This view is upheld by the Supreme Court that said:

“Fraud vitiates [terminates] the most solemn contracts, documents and even

judgments.” [my emphasis]

Such principles as “Fraud and Justice never dwell together,” and “A right

of action cannot arise out of Fraud,” are too high of a thought concept, as is

“Due Process,” “Just Compensation” and “Justice” itself, for those who would

seek to take rights and possessions from us that are rightfully ours, through

evil and deceptive means. Honor is earned by honesty and integrity, not under

false and fraudulent pretenses, nor will the color of the cloth one wears cover

up the usurpations, lies, trickery and deceits. When Black is fraudulently

declared to be White, not all will live in darkness. As astutely observed by

Will Rogers:

“There are men running governments who shouldn’t be allowed to play with


and is as applicable today as Jesus’ statements about lawyers.

So, it should be very clear, at this point, that the reason I do not want

to be included in this system is that I will not accept the lies that have come

from those who have set themselves up as guardians and stewards of the law, and

have accepted the public trust, and in whom we thereby are supposed to trust to

properly apply those laws, but have, in fact, abused their privilege for the

purpose of elevating their personal positions.

If there are still any questions, we need only remember The Federal Tax

Lien Act of 1966, P.L. 89-719, Legislative History, Pg. 3722, which states: “The

entire taxing and monetary systems are hereby placed under the Uniform Commercial

Code.” Remember PUBLIC POLICY?

Another requirement of the UCC is that anyone (including the government)

demanding payment for a bill must make a proper presentment of their claim and

perfect that claim before they may move to collection actions. The UCC calls

this perfection of a claim, among other things, a “True Bill in Commerce.” It

must include a description of the goods and/or services rendered for which a

demand for payment is being made. Has anyone ever seen a “True Bill in Commerce”

from I.R.S.? What products and/or services have they rendered to me? What

products and/or services have they rendered to you? When I.R.S. collects, they

are collecting for the Governor of the World Bank. (see footnote #145, 152-169)

Can anybody show me where I have any legitimate obligation to pay tribute to any

foreign jurisdiction, especially to the Governor of the World Bank?

Again, one must exercise his rights under the UCC not to be compelled to

comply with a contract that he did not enter into knowingly, intentionally and

voluntarily. Otherwise, one MUST comply with the contracts he has signed or, as

I have shown, they are enforceable under a fictitious, voluntary jurisdiction

called Statutory (administrative public policy); a re-birth of the Star Chamber,

by another name.

Many of us have taken oaths to “…uphold and defend the Constitution for the

united states of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” I have. I

did that when I was drafted into the United States Military. Even though, as

Page 39


previously explained, that was a deception on their part. My counsel from the

Church at the time was that we are not conscientious objectors. We are to defend

freedom. Even if we are killed or have to take lives defending our country, it

will be for the honor of our Heavenly Father. Because the lord makes it very

clear that the Constitution is a sacred document, my conscience compels me to

keep my word and stand by that oath. However, it should be noted that all

military actions of the last century have been for the purpose of creating

financial gain for the International Bankers, who create these wars and finance

both sides.

My conscience will no longer allow me to dishonor that oath by

voluntarily paying tribute to a foreign jurisdiction under the guise of taxes to

pay for the operation of government, when in reality it is being used to fund the

armies that are being prepared to come here to murder my children and enslave my

neighbors. (This is the mission statement of the Corporation United States

Government/Governor of the World Bank.) I could not stand by or participate in

such cruelties and abominations any more than I would by receiving, accepting and

honoring a fraudulent tax bill from another foreign jurisdiction such as the

repressive regimes operated by Idi Amean, Khadaffi or the IRA. My conscience no

longer allows me to feed the Beast.

I feel that I have a responsibility to govern myself in accordance with

the knowledge that I have been given. When I stand before my older brother,

Jesus Christ, in judgment, I won’t be able to tell Him that I knew about this;

that I read about it in the Book of Mormon; and yes, that I saw the COMMANDMENT

in Ether 8, but I just didn’t feel like doing anything to attempt to correct my

situation, because it might ruffle the feathers of my brothers, family, friends

and government enforcers. I don’t think I will be able to speak the words: “It

was just too hard to stand up and choose the right.” How could I speak those

words into the face of the One who, in all the universe, is truly the only one

worthy to judge such cowardice? Feeble words like: “I know I’m not supposed to

fear mammon, but I just didn’t want to give up all my creature comforts,” just

won’t cut it at that critical moment of truth.

I cannot speak for the tax laws or rights of citizens of other countries

or of other jurisdictions. And I am sure that they too believe, like we do, that

we have to abide by them. But the tax laws of my Country (THE uNITED sTATES OF

AMERICA) are not the tax laws of the corporate nation (THE UNITED STATES). And,

as I have documented, even if they were, those tax codes do not require me to

“file a tax return” on my earnings, because my occupation is a common occupation

and is not listed as a particular “revenue taxable activity” in that very same


The CODE says that the Secretary of the Treasury will assess me. He

hasn’t done that yet. It says that I have an “election to volunteer.”(see

fn#174) I choose not to volunteer to finance the destruction of this country,

and its Sacred Constitution by paying tribute to a foreign jurisdiction, ie. the

governor of the World Bank. And unless it can be demonstrated to me that I have

made a contract with an agency, which I entered into knowingly, intentionally and

voluntarily, and that contract is in accordance with the Constitution, (i.e.

“laws of the land”) and specifically wherein I agreed to pay such taxes, and that

the contract is legal, binding, devoid of fraud and in force; and/or that the

alternative basis for binding me to this scheme (Social Security) was consummated

with me, as a real party in interest, when I was of a capacity to lawfully enter

such a contract, I cannot go along with what I know to be wrong; and I will

endeavor to do that which is right.

For the Epistle of James rightly says:

“Therefore, to him that knoweth to do good, and doeth it not, to him it

is sin.”

I can understand that the Church will not counsel its members not to

perform on a contract that they have signed. It would be illegal not to perform

on such a contract. Not only would it be illegal, but immoral and subversive to

counsel them not to perform. And those who do not understand how this Babylonian

system works would only be subjecting themselves to further harm and damage under

the guise of lawfulness.

Page 40


What I cannot understand is how the Church, in a general published

statement, can make a political statement, without regard to jurisdiction, which

seems to require me to do something that neither the law nor the code requires of

me. By what authority, can local Church officials expect to sit in judgment of

me when they obviously don’t know what the law says? How can they counsel me to

defend the Constitution and my Country on one occasion, but to forego the

exercise of my own freedom of choice, which is guaranteed to me under that same

Constitution, which I was just counseled to defend, even to the point of giving

my life, if necessary? How can we be the “Standard Bearer of Truth” when we

practice these double standards? More importantly, why would you endeavor to

compel me to comply with a code that, by it’s own definition section, has no

jurisdiction over me and that I am not subject to? How can you compel me to

force my will against my conscience? Common Law does not compel performance.

Isn’t compelling performance Satan’s program? Is compelling me to perform

intended to safeguard my free agency? Has the Church changed its doctrine

concerning the necessity to factor in a man’s true and sincere convictions of

conscience to be considered an important part of the principle of free agency?

In the eyes of the Church, do I no longer have the right to make choices provided

for and guaranteed in the Constitution? Have they determined that the

Constitution is no longer a sacred document? Since when is my exaltation

dependent upon me filing a 1040? If they really do understand what has been done

to our legal system, they should also be aware that I have a legal right to

declare jurisdiction, and a patriotic and moral duty to “…throw off such

government, and to provide new guards for their future security.” That’s what

that oath I once took with such solemnity meant to me when it bound me on my

honor to “…uphold and defend the Constitution against all enemies foreign and


I wish to make it very clear here that the purpose for this type of

system of taxation is the same as it was in the Book of Mormon at the time of

King Lemhi’s bondage to the Lamanites, or of King Noah’s abuse of his own people,

or in the Third Reich under Adolph Hitler. It is simply a tool to suppress the

people to be able to control them and their ability and means to enjoy and

protect their freedoms, both civil and religious.

It has been stated many times, both by historians and leaders of the

Church, that those who do not study history are bound to repeat it. The

scriptures are a part of our history. We need to study them as our guide for

today. We need to compare what happened then with what is happening now. I have

found many people who are not using the Book of Mormon as a guide for what is

happening today. One of the most obvious examples of this is our situation

concerning taxes. Many people do not know how extensive our taxes are, including

payroll taxes. Look at the example the Book of Mormon gives us of taxation, and

both the cause and effect of this activity:

“And he laid a tax of one fifth part of all they possessed, a fifth part of their

gold and of their silver, and fifth part of their ziff, and of their copper, and

of their brass and their iron; and a fifth part of their fatlings; and also a

fifth part of all their grain… Yea, and thus they [King Noah and his priests]

were supported in their laziness, and their idolatry, and their whoredoms, by the

taxes which King Noah had put upon his people; thus did the people labor

exceedingly to support iniquity.”

Were these taxes a righteous act on the part of King Noah? How do these

taxes compare with today’s taxes? Are they not used, to some extent, in the same

manner? From whom do those who supported and administered King Noah’s taxes get

their reward? From whom do those who support and administer today’s tax system

get their reward? Is it not true that we will receive our reward from whom we


In America Wake Up, in 1963 on page 125, Ayn Rand said:

“The man who produces while others dispose of his product is a


The average $15 per hour worker today can pay as high as 30% for Federal

taxes, 10% State taxes, 8% Social Security plus Workers Comp, unemployment and

Page 41


Medicare, all together can easily add up to over 50%. When you consider what the

company is required to pay, the hourly cost of this employee is approximately

$20.70. When you add in sales taxes, fees and excises, this easily comes to much

more than 50% taxation. This may be the worst-case scenario, but try it out on

your paycheck and see how it adds up. You see, we are taxed to make money, we

are taxed to save money and we are taxed to spend money.

Mosiah said:

“For behold, we are in bondage to the Lamanites, and are taxed with a tax which

is grievous to be borne…And all this he [the King of the Lamanites] did, for

the sole purpose of bringing this people into subjection or bondage. And behold,

we at this time do pay tribute to the king of the Lamanites, to the amount of one

half of our corn, and our barley, and even all our grain of every kind, and one

half of the increase of our flocks and our herds; and even one half of all we

have or possess the king of the Lamanites doth exact of us, or our lives. And

now, is not this grievous to be borne? And is not this, our affliction, great?

Now behold, how great reason we have to mourn.

If this Nephite prophet thought that this tax was grievous and it made

his people “labor exceedingly to support,” are the goals of those who govern us

not understandably clear by this example? In an April 1963 Conference Report,

President Spencer W. Kimble said:

“[one who reads the Book of Mormon] will see people taxed from 50 percent, and

then to totalness, to slavery and to bondage. He will see power-greedy,

paternalistic, centralized governments move toward the inevitable revolution

which finally impoverishes but frees people to begin again from ashes.”

Will our inaction and silence reward us with revolution? Is that what we

want? Or is that what we are willing to settle for instead of heeding the

warnings of prophets, and at the same time denigrating the sacrifices of our

forefathers who paid the price and wrote us a contract [Constitution] for those

who would govern us and guarantee our personal freedoms?

The question has arisen as to how we pay for government if we were to

have no taxing entity. Most of our services are already paid for through sales,

gasoline, or property taxes and by permits, however inappropriate they may be. I

will soon show you that the taxes collected by the I.R.S. do not pay for

government services. However, the government is currently being paid for by your

“voluntary contributions” to Social Security since those contributions go into

the government’s general account and the courts have ruled that it is just

another form of income tax.

It is more than obvious that when these secret combinations take over, we

have a duty, to at the very least, let that be known. When the government is

operating under a secret jurisdiction and they will not disclose this fact to

you, your choices are to either, be silent, and continue to support the secret

combination, or seek the Remedy provided in the Law.

The notion has been offered that if one does not like the current system

he must resolve it in the courts. First of all, this is a misinformed opinion.

An investigation into this process will disclose even more of the secret

workings. The Codified Rules of Federal Procedure say that the District Courts

(which is where you have to start when dealing with the “national corporate

State”) cannot hear cases that deal with general employment taxes. Here’s our

first clue. What they are saying is that you are being taxed NOT on your income,

but on the mere privilege of being employed. The “income” is only used as a gage

by which the amount of tax is determined. This relates directly to the all

important assessment process. Were the “income” itself taxed [the fruits of my

own industry], it would be a direct tax, and thus it would be a claim which the

District of Columbia could not perfect as per the Uniform Commercial Code and

Federal Regulations quoted at length in the above. A direct tax is, of course,

unconstitutional. We’ve already seen in Redfield v. Fisher that being taxed on

the (construed) privilege of being employed is inconsistent with court rulings of

law, but here we’re talking about The Codified Rules of Federal Procedure —

Page 42


court procedure. So, in other words, technically speaking, you can’t get your

tax case into a District Court on a liability issue to start with. Liability

questions can only be heard by the Circuit courts and above, while administrative

procedure questions, of which the assessment process is chief in importance, are

to be adjudicated in the District Courts. And, when it comes to income taxes,

other than employment taxes, the Tax Court is the proper place to begin. But

they don’t deal with the legality of the issue, they only deal with controversies

over administrative questions like assessments, and whether or not they have

followed prescribed procedures in accordance with the regulations. Confusing,

isn’t it? Is it any wonder it appears that our court system is stacked against

us? They get to make up the rules, and they can change them whenever they wish,

without reference to the requirement that when applied, they must honor and

conform to your Constitutional rights.

You see, Tax Courts are not Article III Courts under the Constitution.

The tax Court is an Article I Legislative Court [Tribunal] for legislation

enacted by Congress under the jurisdictional limitations imposed by Article I,

Section 8, Clause 17 of the Constitution. Its ONLY power is to enforce

administrative procedures. In the D.C. Code, Title 11 at page 13, it says,

“Legislation enacted by Congress applicable to the inferior federal courts in the

exercise of the power under Article III of the Constitution CANNOT BE AFFECTED BY

LEGISLATION ENACTED BY CONGRESS under Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 of the

Constitution.” When these courts make decisions or “considerations,” they are

not without monetarily advantageous, ulterior motives. This is sometimes

referred to as a chancery court. However, these “considerations,” if allowed to

stand, would constitute an adjudication of law, which cannot be determined by an

Article I Court. Those decisions are supposed to be left to Article III Courts.

Again, we see the clear distinction between laws passed by Congress for the

District of Columbia [United States citizens having no Constitutional rights]

under Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17, in contradistinction to Constitutionally

correct law that applies to the 50 Sovereign States [Citizens of the United

Stated of America]. This allowance of “considerations” is clear evidence that

this Constitution has been applied as Corporate Policy. This is the jurisdiction

these courts actually sit in. They are to safeguard this stream of the

corporation’s income and financial control over the franchised citizens.

Even if you have had property taken illegally/mistakenly by the

government you have to follow a procedure to sue. You have to hire an attorney.

He has to write the Attorney General of the United States to get permission to

sue the government. And then the case is limited only to whether the government

agency followed proper collection procedures, not whether the government has the

right to tax you and thereby confiscate your property. If they did try such

cases, they would lose because their tax system violates their own law. By the

time you do all that, even in cases of mistaken identity, you will have almost

certainly lost your possessions in a Marshall’s sale.

The other point is that in 1973 the Congress recognized and renewed the

actions taken on March 9, 1933 which were to give the President of the United

States the same powers as if we had been invaded by an enemy from another country

with whom we were at war. Senate Report 93-549, written in 1973 says:

“Since March 9, 1933, the United States has been in a state of declared

emergency. A majority of the people of the United States has lived all their

lives under emergency rule. For 40 years, freedoms and governmental procedures

guaranteed by the Constitution, have, in varying degrees, been abridged by laws

brought into force by states of National emergency. In the United States,

actions taken by government in times of great crisis have…in important ways

shaped the present phenomenon of a permanent state of National

emergency.”…”These proclamations give force to 470 provisions of federal law.

These hundreds of statutes delegate to the President extraordinary powers,

ordinarily exercised by Congress, which affect the lives of American citizens in

a host of all-encompassing manners. This vast range of powers, taken together,

confers enough authority to rule this country without reference to normal

Constitutional process. Under the powers delegated by these statutes, the

President may: seize property, organize and control the means of production;

seize commodities; assign military forces abroad; institute martial law; seize

and control all transportation and communication; regulate the operation of

private enterprise; restrict travel; and, in a plethora of particular ways,

Page 43


control the lives of all American citizens.”[my emphasis]

Every President of the United States since Franklin D. Roosevelt has

signed these emergency powers declarations and every Congress has approved them.

George Bush extended the national emergency on May 30th, 1992 by signing

executive order #12808. Bill Clinton extended it by signing another executive

order on May 25th, 1993. He has signed three of them since he has taken office.

When was the last time we were invaded? When was the last time Congress declared

us to be in a war? Or a national emergency? What is the current emergency?!

It has become common knowledge that the government has extensive involvement in

the drug trafficking business. From the Iran Contra Scandal involving Oliver

North and the selling of drugs through the Castle Bank in the Bahamas (C.I.A.

owned), to providing arms and money to the Contras; to the Bush involvement with

Panama, refusing to remove Manuel Noriega (whom he had recommended by installed

to replace General Torrijos when he was the director of the C.I.A.) when the

country got tired of his illegal activities; ordering “Operation Watchtower” to

install low-level transmitters throughout Central America so that the C.I.A.

could make thirty to forty low level flights per night from Columbia to Panama

without showing up on the radar; to replacing Noriega with Guillermo Endara, in

spite of the fact the Endara is a director of a Panamanian Bank long used by

Columbia’s Medellin drug cartel; the newly installed Second Vice President —

Guillermo Ford is part owner of the Dadeland Bank in Florida. In 1980, the

Dadeland Bank was named in a U.S. Court case as a central laundering institution

for the drug cartels. This bank is linked with Gonzolo Mora, one of the chief

money launderers for the Medellin cartel. In addition, the newly installed

Attorney General, Rogelio Cruz, sits on the board of a bank owned by one of the

major figures in Columbia’s Cali drug cartel. Sanctions had been placed on the

Banco Occidente and the Bank of Credit Commerce International and they were

respectively fined a total of $5 million and $15 million. A total fine amounting

to 14 days of interest on their capital. On February 6, 1990, President Bush

announced that economic restrictions, (especially BANKING) would be quickly

removed in the weeks ahead. U. S. Drug Enforcement Administration Officials

immediately said that the removal of bank restrictions “…will cause illegal

profits to again pour into the country’s 110 banks.” Or George Bush’s

involvement with placing Richard Armatauge (the Secretary of the Navy) and Ted

Shackleford (then Assistant Director of the C.I.A.) who, as it has been

disclosed, have had direct drug dealings with Kum Sa (Opium Lord of the Golden

Triangle) buying heroin with transactions through the Hong Kong branch of the

Bank of America. And now, dealings surrounding Bill Clinton and Myna, Arkansas

bringing in vast quantities of drugs in association with Webster Hubbell, Don

Tyson and Jack Stevens. The point being that all of these Presidents had the

power to remove all those involved without declaring a National Emergency, but

did not. In Bill Clinton’s case, his administration cut the Drug Enforcement

Agency’s budget by over 70%. How can you have a “war on drugs” when all you are

doing is funding the front office to appear as if there is a Drug Enforcement

Administration? Or is there another possibility? Is this only a perpetuation of

an emergency (using a very lethal tool) to maintain control over the government

and the people of this nation?

In the Constitution, “We the People” gave the Congress the power to

declare such emergencies on a temporary basis. When the emergency is over, it is

to be formally declared and the Constitution restored. This is why the

Constitution limits Congress’s power to maintain a standing army, and thereby

keeps the government from abusing this emergency powers provision. This is

reinforced by the 2nd amendment and Title 10 USC and Title 32 USC that provides

for a well-regulated militia. A militia is an armed force that belongs to a

State, this “…being necessary to the security of a free State…” When Congress

needs an army all they have to do is call upon the several States to provide from

the militias to form its army. That way the Federal Government does not maintain

more military power than the State Republics. This was and still stands as the

intent of the Framers! Isn’t it odd how these secret combinations turn our laws

and Constitutional provisions around on us to get power over us? The point here

being that when this emergency I spoke of in the previous paragraph was declared,

it suspended the CONSTITUTION!!!! This was only intended to be enacted on a

temporary basis. As soon as the emergency ceases to exist, Congress is to make

that declaration and reinstate the Constitution.

Page 44


President Herbert Hoover had requested recommendations on how to resolve

the financial crisis that existed during his administration. This crisis was

created by the International Bankers, i.e. the Federal Reserve Act. He received

a recommendation for invoking an Act of Congress suggested by the New York

Regional Board (the lead board) of the Federal Reserve. [Like asking the fox to

baby-sit the hen house while the farmer goes to town for the Saturday night

dance.] Their recommendation was the Trading with the Enemy Act, of October 6,

1917, except that the part at the end that “…exempted Americans and all of

their domestic transactions.” had been eliminated and replaced with: (*****). He

said that was dangerous, too drastic and did not need to be implemented. Less

than ten days later President Franklin D. Roosevelt was inaugurated. His very

first act as chief executive was to call a special session of Congress, in which

they passed this very same recommendation Hoover had rejected just a few days

earlier. It was called the Banking Relief Act [and the House and Senate didn’t

read it before they signed it because there were no copies in print at the time

it was signed], which was for the purpose of exonerating the banking cartels and

their co-conspirators, the federal government, who had embezzled an estimated 44

of the 45 billion in gold bullion and securities entrusted to their care to back

the dollars then in circulation. They soon moved to cover their theft with the

gold call-in of April 5, 1933. The recommendation the Federal Reserve Board

made, that Wilson rejected, was also put into effect. It is now codified under

current law as Title 12, Section 95 (a), as amended. That is correct. Your

Congress has declared you an enemy of the United States Government.

What does that mean to you? Well, for one thing, you have lost your

“Persona Standi en Judicio.” That means that you do not have the right to sue

the government in a Court of Law. It also means that you, as a captured enemy of

war, don’t own anything. You forfeit all rights and are then only allowed

[civil] privileges. Senate Document No. 43, 73rd Congress, 1st Session, states:

“The ownership of all property is in the state; individual so-called ‘ownership’

is only by virtue of Government, i.e., law, amounting to mere user; and use must

be in accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the State.”

Now, where is your security?

You have the right to defend your persona propria, and the courts cannot

and will not take that away from you. But the fraud is perpetrated in that they

will not disclose to you the jurisdiction that you are in. If they did so, their

jurisdiction over you would cease to exist.

And as I have shown above, if they did disclose this to you, you would be able to

see your remedy and the way out, demanding that they set the forum properly,

which would place you in a jurisdiction which maintains your God-given rights.

This instead of the privileges they choose to allow you at any particular time.

President Roosevelt’s Proclamation 2038 (as suggested by the bankers)


“Whereas there have been heavy and unwarranted withdrawals of gold and currency

from our banking institutions for the purpose of ‘…hoarding…’ etc.”

Now stop and think about this for a moment, and let’s reason through things here.

The people deposited their gold in the bank. They were issued a contractual

certificate (federal reserve note) saying that they could withdraw their gold any

time they presented the Federal Reserve note for payment. It was a claim check,

like a warehouse receipt. Much like the U.C.C. requirements that a “presentment

of claim” must be made in order to collect on any debt derived from or founded

upon that claim. At this time many people were starving, living in the street or

in shacks, begging handouts, and those that had gold in the bank needed it back.

And it was these very same Federal Reserve bankers that had caused the problems

to start with. Yet the banker’s resolution claimed the withdrawals were

unwarranted and were for the purpose of “hoarding?” These bankers asked, in

effect, to be let out of their contract to give back the gold upon demand and

presentment of the claim receipts by the rightful owners; that is, to the

depositors, upon presentment of their bank notes and the demand for their

property. When the bankers couldn’t make good on their promise to return the

gold, panic struck. At that point, we were under martial law so it was easy to

compel us to convert over to a quasi-military scrip: fiat money. How? The

Silver Certificates (those claim checks or gold warehouse receipts) were

Page 45


re-printed as Federal Reserve Notes. The difference? The former had a promise

to pay on their face. The latter does not.

The 1994 Crime Bill should be more properly called the “Enslavement

Bill.” For starters, it is estimated that it will cost the American Taxpayers

$30,000,000,000 (YES! THIRTY BILLION!!) to enforce the confiscation of their own

property and rights. It’s interesting that in the new “Crime Bill,” that

lawmakers signed without reading, (because there were only three copies in

existence when they signed it) if you have more than three months of food, etc.,

in your home you are “hoarding.” You then fit the definition, under this

legislation, of a terrorist. What, or who do you think they are going after


The Senate version, S.17091, Section ss5108, includes the following:

“Not later than six months after the date of enactment of the Act, the Attorney

General, in concert with the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the

Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Agency, the Commissioner of the Immigration

and Naturalization Service, and the Commissioner of the Customs Service, shall

report to the Congress and The President of the effort made, and the success of

such efforts, to recruit and hire former Royal Hong Kong Police officers into

Federal and law enforcement positions. The report shall discuss any legal or

administrative barriers preventing a program of adequate recruitment of former

Royal Hong Kong Police officers.”

So this bill requires hiring Hong Kong Police as riot control. Since

they will no longer be needed when Hong Kong is returned to China, this will

insure them employment. Hong Kong uses Gerka Militia for their police force.

They have long recognized the effectiveness of a police force that has no

emotional ties to the community. Why do we need to employ foreign police

officers that are not bound by a constitutional oath to “protect and defend?”

Who conceived this law and who is supporting it? What do they have planned for

the American people?

Proclamation 2040 stated:

“…by the authority vested in me by Section 5(b) of the Act of October 6, 1917

(40 Stat. 1.411) as amended by the act of March 9,1933, I do hereby proclaim,

order, direct and declare that all the terms and provisions of said Proclamation

of March 6, 1933, [2039] and the regulations and orders issued there under are

hereby continued in full force and effect until further proclamation by the


In Section 5(b) of the Act of October 6, 1917 (40 Stat. L. 411) it says:

“During time of war or during any other period of national emergency declared by

the President, the President may, through any agency that he may designate, or

otherwise, investigate, regulate, or prohibit, under such rules and regulations

as he may prescribe, by means of licenses or otherwise, any transactions in

foreign exchange, transfers of credit between or payments by banking institutions

as defined by the President, and export, hoarding, melting, or earmarking of gold

or silver coin or bullion or currency, transfers of credit in any form…”

This proclamation was issued before the Congress met, and before Section

5(b) of the Act of October 6, 1917 had even been considered for amendment, much

less had actually been amended. The President of the United States of America,

at this time, became the benevolent director of a corporate oligarchy portrayed

as a Democracy, but which would function in all reality as a fascist junta.

Whatever he declares under Executive Order is construed as law and Congress has

pre-approved it. This is not government by the people and of the people. This

Proclamation was re-confirmed in 1973. And it will remain this way until the

President gives this power back voluntarily. I am not going to hold my breath on

that one. Our other course of action is to put enough pressure on Congress to

activate the alternatives, one of which is the Constitutional provision for

beginning the process of impeachment against the President if he will not take us

out of this Emergency status and reinstate the Republic. If these options don’t

work, and were not invaded by a foreign foe, We The People can re-establish civil

government as did our forefathers — through an alternative peaceful means known

Page 46


as Jural societies.

Approximately two weeks before John F. Kennedy was assassinated he

ordered the printing of $450 billion in U.S. Treasury Dollars. [The united

State’s Note, after the example of Abraham Lincoln’s “greenbacks”] Section 31 of

the “Federal Reserve Act” allows Congress all the clout they need to terminate

the Federal Reserve’s contract. He was preparing to ask them to do that. He was

preparing to put the D.C. corporate monster back in the chains of the

Constitution. Ten days before President John F. Kennedy was assassinated he

spoke at Columbia University where he said:

“The high office of President has been used to foment a plot to destroy the

American’s freedom, and before I leave office I must inform the citizen of his


Immediately after Lyndon B. Johnson was sworn into office, like

Roosevelt, his very first act was to cancel that order and the banksters went

right back to business as usual. On to the “Great Society.”

In Proverbs it tells us that: “Where there is no vision, the people

perish…” Moroni has seen the visions shown to him by Jesus Christ of our

latter day problems. He wanted to share the knowledge and understanding of the

visions he had about us. So much about the effects of these secret combinations

has been included in the Book of Mormon so that we would be able to recognize

their workings when we see them. Considering the vast number of records they had

available and could chose from to include in the Book of Mormon, their selection

of which records we would need, and which would be most beneficial must obviously

be very significant to us, and should indicate the importance of what the Lord is

trying to teach us. The Dead Sea Scrolls say that they and many other records

were hidden up that they might be brought forth in the last days, like a flood,

so that the righteous would have every thing they would need for a last great

fight against evil. The Book of Mormon was the beginning of this flood. Christ

told us that:

“Even so it shall be in that day when they shall see all these

things, then shall they know that the hour is nigh.”

He didn’t forewarn us to make sign seekers out of us, but to prepare the

righteous who would accept his council. And, so that we might know of the danger

this condition would put us in. Our responsibility is to see it for what it is

in time to do something about it. The Church will be here when he returns. Will

we be worthy to stand with him if we do not do our part now?

History has shown that we can pay for our freedom now or we can pay for

it later and receive nothing for our expenditure of resources, grief, poverty,

misery, slavery, and death while our children live on, only to be swallowed up in

the depersonalized abyss and oblivion that was created by the secret

combinations, to strip them also of their sovereign birthright. The question we

have to ask ourselves is: “What will the price be to recover our freedoms after

they are lost?”

A modern day prophet warns us in this manner:

“Now, we are assured that the Church will remain on the earth until the Lord

comes again — but at what price? The Saints in the early days were assured that

Zion would be established in Jackson County, but look at what their

unfaithfulness cost them in bloodshed and delay.”

President J. Reuben Clark warned us that:

“We stand in danger of losing our liberties, and that once lost, only blood will

bring them back; and once lost, we of this Church will, in order to keep the

Church going forward, have more sacrifices to make and more persecutions to

endure than we have yet known.’ (CR April, 1944, p. 116) And he stated that if

the conspiracy ‘…comes here it will probably come in its full vigor and there

will be a lot of vacant places among those who guide and direct, not only this

government, but also this Church of ours.’ “(CR April, 1952)

Will we have searched the scriptures and paid heed to what they tell us

Page 47


will happen, and what we are supposed to do about it? Will we have listened?

Will we have paid proper heed to these words of forewarning from the Prophets?

Are we following our leaders because of the position they hold or do we follow

them because we studied and received, from the Lord, an understanding of the

scriptural principles they are talking about and have prayed about their message

and had a witness from the Holy Ghost that what they have said is the word of the

Lord? Or will we go down in history as those who just buried our heads in the

sand and said, “All is well in Zion?”

Many people living on the land in this Country today do not believe in

the secret combinations. Nor do they believe in conspiracies, which is the

modern word for secret combinations. Every goal of the conspiracy, identified by

President Benson and many other prophets of the Lord, has been met. We as a

people and a nation have embraced each and every principle proposed by the author

of the conspiracy. The conspiracy is here in full force. I have used Public

Record to show you documentation (case law, code and direct quotes from the

Congressional Record) of some of them. But there are many more that we are not

yet aware of. What I have shown you is no longer a secret. This part is no more

a conspiracy, because a conspiracy by definition is secret. It does prove that

they have already gotten into our legal and governmental systems as Moroni warned

us. Our Constitution has been suspended by executive decree and the weak kneed

cooperation of Congress. How long will we allow this secret combination to grow?

We fight such assaults as the Declaration of Interdependence. It says thing

like: “The era of Nations is over. We should drop our borders and allow anyone

who wishes to come and go freely. Our Wealth should be shared throughout the

world. We should give up our Sovereignty as a Nation.” If we go along with this

and give up our guns, they will put a United Nations Peace-Keeping Force in our

neighborhoods to protect us. Whose peacekeeping force? Red China’s? This

spawns “agreements” and “treaties” such as N.A.F.T.A. and G.A.T.T. by which our

Citizens, our borders, our foreign trade, our homelands are all compromised. Our

National Parks, for example, no longer belong to the American People!! They are

now property of the World Community and World Citizens as “International


How long will we feed this monster with our silence, our financial sustenance,

our fighting men, our own sovereignty, all to the shame and disgrace of the Name

and reputation of our Heavenly Father?

If we have any question whether these secret combinations exist, we only

need look at the brazen announcements that they themselves offer.

In an address to Congress on September 11, 1990, President George Bush

delivered a speech entitled “Toward a New World Order.” Addressing the subject

of his Gulf War, he made his first public utterance of his, and his rich crony’s

plans for a world imperialism in stating that the war against Iraq was:

”…a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of

these troubled times…a New World Order can emerge.”

This UN “operation” was a show of force, or of farce, if we look behind

the scenes. Saddam Hussein was financed by George Bush and his associates, so

that this flash point could be created.

The point is that our relationship with the UN is not in our best

interest. The United Nations’ World Constitution states, in part:

“…The age of nations must end…The governments of the nations have decided to

order their separate sovereignties into one government to which they surrender

their arms.”

It is quite apparent that the “Treasonous” and “Seditious” are brewing up

a storm of untold magnitude. In other public addresses, Bush also admitted to

“Interdependence,” “One World Order,” affiliation and collusion with the Soviet

Union Oligarchy and direction by the U.N.

Page 48


Even non-Church leaders have commented on their observations of some of

these groups, the activities of which, the non-suspecting citizen may not notice.

John E Rankin, U.S. Congressman said:

“The United Nations is the greatest fraud in all History. Its purpose is to

destroy the United States.”

Other detractors make the United Nation’s position very clear. Brock

Chisholm, former director of the UN’s World Health Organization stated:

“To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men,

their individualism, loyalty to family traditions, national patriotism and

religious dogmas.”

David Rockefeller, international billionaire, humanist, and CFR kingpin, founder

of the Trilateral Commission voiced his praise of the controlled U.S. media for

keeping their oath not to divulge the Globalist plans to the public. Speaking to

his fellow conspirators at a meeting, June 1991, in Baden Baden, Germany, of yet

one more infamous World Order group, the Bilderburgers, Mr. Rockefeller said:

“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and

other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected

their promises of discretion for almost forty years.”

He went on to explain:

”It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had

been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the

world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government.

The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is

surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past


Maybe we should ask [then] Governor Bill Clinton or Dan Quail to clarify

this, as they were both there. Bush and Clinton are Bilderburger globalists and

their goals for America are the same.

Franklin D. Roosevelt, U.S. President, in a letter written November

21,1933 to Colonel E. Mandell House, Roosevelt states:

“The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in

the large centers has owned the government of the U.S. since the days of Andrew


The late U.S. Senator Barry Goldwater (Arizona) in his book “With No

Apologies” stated:

“The Trilateral Commission is international…(and)…is intended to be the

vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests

by seizing control of the political government of the United States. The

Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize

control and consolidate the four centers of power – POLITICAL, MONITORY,


Benjamin Desraeli, Prime Minister of England, was attributed with this

statement in 1844:

“The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by

those who are not behind the scenes.”

Justice Felix Frankfurter, U.S. Supreme Court Justice:

“The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise power from behind the


Dr. Kurk E. Koch, Professor, lectured at 100 Universities in 65 countries

on 5 continents. Subjects of expertise: New World Order, Occultism, Extreme

Monuments, and Parapsychology. His assessment of the coming NWO under the United

Nations is that it will reduce everything to one common denominator:

Page 49


“The system will be made up of a single currency, single centrally financed

government, single tax system, single language, single political system, single

world court justice, single head (one individual leader), single state religion.”

He further states:

“Each person will have a registered number, without which he will not be allowed

to buy or sell; and there will be one universal world church. Anyone who refuses

to take part in this universal system will have no right to exist.”

David Spangler, Director of PLANETARY INITIATIVE, (a United Nations World

government group):

“No one will enter the New World Order unless he or she will make a pledge to

worship Lucifer. No one will enter the New Age unless he will take a Luciferian


Ralph Nader:

“Is there a number or mark planned for the hand or forehead in a new cashless

society? YES, and I have seen the machines that are now ready to put it into


Zbigniew Brezhinshy, National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter and

advisor to 4 other presidents, Executive Director of the Trilateral Commission,

Marxist and proud of it, speaks out about what the New World Order will be like:

“The Technetronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled

society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by

traditional values.”

In his book BETWEEN TWO AGES, he says:

“Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every

citizen and maintain up-to-date, complete files containing even the most personal

information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous

retrieval by the authorities.”

[Zbigniew] Brzezinski not long ago also revealed that on July 3, 1979 unknown to

the American public and Congress, President Jimmy Carter secretly authorized $500

million to create an international terrorist movement that would spread Islamic

fundamentalism in Central Asia and “destabilize” the Soviet Union… The CIA

called this Operation Cyclone and in the following years poured an additional $4

billion into setting up Islamic training schools in Pakistan (Taliban means


Young zealots were sent to the CIA’s spy training camp in Virginia, where future

members of al-Qaeda were taught “sabotage skills” – terrorism. Others were

recruited at an Islamic school in Brooklyn, New York, within sight of the fated

Twin Towers. In Pakistan, they were directed by British MI-6 officers and trained

by the SAS. The result, quipped Brzezinski, was “a few stirred up Muslims” –

meaning the Taliban.

The New World Order is not new. Satan’s church became so powerful at one

time in the earth’s history that it actually controlled the world. This occurred

in the days of Noah. Secret combinations took over all the earthly governments

and set up a world government that worshipped Satan. They called their satanic

world government “Atlantis.” The common story about Atlantis is that it was a

mythical land of riches, gold and silver. In Atlantis there was no war or

poverty and everyone lived in peace and prosperity. Atlantis ended when the

world was covered by the oceans. The difference between the story of Atlantis

and the story of Noah depends on your point of view. Satan and his followers

thought Atlantis was wonderful; they had created a truly worldwide satanic

kingdom. God, on the other hand, saw that this society was so wicked that he was

forced to wipe it off the face of the earth.

According to the writings of modern secret combinations, primarily

Page 50


Freemasons, the world immediately before the flood was ruled by a cooperative

agreement between the ten great nations of the earth. Seven of these kings ruled

over what was known as the continent of Atlantis and the other three ruled over

what is now Europe, Asia and Africa. These ten nations each had total control

over their people and persecuted or killed all those who worshipped Christ. The

wicked followers of Satan entered into oaths to kill Noah, but he was protected

by the power of God.

The ten nations also made war on the city of Enoch but were rebuked by

the power of Enoch’s priesthood. Enoch said that Satan had the world in

“chains,” suggesting some type of powerful physical control over people:

“…he beheld Satan; and he [Satan] had a great chain in his hand, and it veiled

the whole face of the earth with darkness.”

This chain, according to Masonic writers, was a world government that was

controlled by secret societies until the time of the flood. The government of

Atlantis was run by Satan’s church, in the secret societies, and it controlled

almost everything.

The secret combinations realized that they would only be successful in

organizing a world of Satanism if they could overthrow the existing Christian

order. They called the new society that they wanted to establish “The New World

Order.” The reason the Atlantis alliance of ten nations was called “The New World

Order” is that it had overthrown the “Old World Order” which was based on

Christianity. The term New World Order literally means a world that has

abandoned Christ and turned to the worship of Satan. The Old Order, before the

days of Noah, was founded upon the Church of Jesus Christ. Society was based on

the authority of the Holy Order of the Son of God. Satan’s church was bent on

overthrowing this system and setting up a new order, a New World Order, which

would abolish Christianity and follow the plan of Satan. The term “New World

Order” means the same thing today — abolishment of Christianity and the adoption

of Satan’s plan — whether spoken in the lodges and meetings of secret societies

or on national television by George Bush and Mikhail Gorbachev. This does not

necessarily mean that Bush and Gorbachev are Satan worshipers, but they have

accepted his plan — that governments should use force to make people live


The religion of the Atlantis New World Order was originally humanism.

This religion is promoted today by the secret societies that control America. It

is the religion of atheism and evolution and its major tenets are that

governments should 1) force men to live correctly and 2) solve the world’s

problems by ending war and ensuring global peace. When humanism had wiped out

Christianity, the secret combinations that controlled the governments introduced

the religion of Satanism. Both humanism and Satanism reject Christian

righteousness and teach that men are naturally immoral. Such a philosophy

teaches society that it need not obey commandments, but that it should fulfill

its carnal desires. Eventually the Atlantis society became so wicked that the

Lord cleansed the earth by flood.

Satan’s church -secret societies – has wanted to restore the New World

Order system since its first New World Order was destroyed at the time of the

flood. Its first post-flood success was the gathering of nations at the Tower

of Babel, but the Lord thwarted this plan as he had in the days of Noah, albeit

not as harshly. Since then, Satan’s church has had to destroy nations as well as

Christianity. The “Great and Abominable Church of the Devil” that is mentioned

in the scriptures is the worldwide organization of secret societies that are

taking over the governments of the world and creating satanic systems. That is

why the scriptures describe Satan’s church as one that “…sheds the blood of the

saints and prophets…” and “…which slayeth the saints of God, yea, and

tortureth them and bindeth them with a yoke of iron, and bringeth them down into

captivity.” This is obviously not referring to another Christian church. No

Christian church has ever gone around killing the saints, except when it was the

official church of a government, and in such cases the government has always been

controlled by secret combinations rather than any church. Often these persons

were the leaders of both secret combinations and the churches, but the killing

was a result of their secret societies rather than the teachings of their

Christian churches.

Page 51


Nephi warns that those who become subject to Satan “…become devils,

angels to a devil” and are stirred up “…unto secret combinations of murder and

all manner of secret works of darkness.” Secret combinations have consistently

killed the saints and the prophets since the day that Cain made a secret oath

with Satan to kill Able. The prophets Joseph and Hyrum were killed by members of

a secret combination that had made a satanic blood oath to kill them.

Satan’s great and abominable church, the whore of all the earth, is made

up of secret combinations that control governments. Satan’s kingdom is often

called Babylon, which refers to an ancient nation whose government was run by

secret societies. Communism is another example. It is based on the satanic

principle of force and was organized and is controlled today by secret societies.

Carl Marx was a Satanist who worked for a secret combination that hired him to

put his name to the Communist Manifesto. (Richard Wurmbrand, Marx and Satan)

Lenin was part of the same secret combination. Lenin was not the leader of the

Russian Revolution, but rather a pawn in the hands of secret societies. Every

single Soviet leader since him, including both Gorbachev and Yeltsin, has been in

the same position.

Satan and his church, the secret combinations, are attempting to set up a

government of force in the united states today. It will be called “democratic

socialism” under the New World Order, but it is nothing more than government

controlled by satanic secret societies. George Bush was the first President of

the United States to openly declare on national television that he planed to

establish a New World Order, as he displayed secret hand signs of the

“Bones”(secret society).

To some people this may sound like the Millennium. However, scripture

disallows the possibility of man-made world peace, instead predicting that men

will increase in war until Armageddon, after which the Savior himself will

establish the millennial era. Jeremiah warned us to beware when men cry “peace,

peace and there is no peace.” Paul spoke to our day when he said: “For when they

shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them…”

President Benson said in October 1988:

“A secret combination that seeks to overthrow the freedom of all lands, nations

and countries is increasing its evil influence and control over America and the

entire world.”

Less than three weeks later George Bush was elected as U. S. President.

Speaking of our day, Moroni said:

“Behold, I speak unto you as if you were present, and yet ye are

not. But behold, Jesus Christ hath shown you unto me, and I know your


Having seen our day, and this secret combination of which President

Benson warns, Moroni engraved the Book of Ether into the record we would read

because, as Alma told his son Heleman, the main purpose of the twenty-four plates

of Ether is to manifest unto the people the strength and danger of secret


Alma said:

“Yea, and cursed be the land forever and ever unto those workers of darkness and

secret combinations, even unto destruction, except they repent before they are

fully ripe.”

President Benson said:

“The Book of Mormon exposes the enemies of Christ. It confounds false doctrines

and lays down contention. It fortifies the humble followers of Christ against

the evil designs, strategies and doctrines of the devil in our day. The type of

apostates in the Book of Mormon are similar to the type we have today. God, in

his infinite foreknowledge, so molded the Book of Mormon that we might see the

error and know how to combat false educational, political, religious and

Page 52


philosophical concepts of our time.”

We live in a day when Satan’s secret combinations are gaining control of

our government and most of the world. They are working to set up a New World

Order, and their self-proclaimed timetable is to organize it by the year 2000.

Their immediate plans, according to one of their main spokesmen, Henry Kissinger,

are to take total control of food and oil. By controlling oil they control all

the nations and militaries of the world. By controlling food the secret

combinations can control individuals. Most people don’t have enough food to last

more than a week without going to the store. This is the estimated time it would

take to destroy the trucking industry that delivers food to the markets by

certain fuel price hikes and monetary restrictions. Provisions in the new “Crime

Bill” state that if you have more than a three-month supply of food or other

necessities, you are “hoarding,” and you fit the definition of a “terrorist.”

One possible disaster is a minor nuclear strike or accident. This may be

one of the reasons why President Bush was ordered by the secret combinations to

take much of the U.S. Nuclear force off alert.

Another possible disaster is the failure of all U.S. banks, which would

leave people bankrupt and totally dependent on the government for food. This is

why the S&Ls have been forced to fail (they were required, by law before the

Banking Deregulation Act, to be at least 50% asset based instead of totally

fractional as are banks), and why the banks are so shaky. There are other

possible created disasters and the secret combinations could also just take

advantage of any natural disasters, earthquakes, fires, floods, hurricanes, etc.,

that come along. Once a disaster occurs, the plan of the secret combination is

to force everyone to adopt a new buying and selling system.Under this system,

nobody will be able to buy food or clothing unless they have a personalized

identification number stamped or implanted in their body. This number will tie

directly into a centralized computer system, which will control all money

transactions. Paper and metal money will be obsolete.

If the personal identification number is implanted in the form of a

bar-code or computer chip, it can be tracked by satellite and the government will

be able to know where every person is at all times. Through this system, or one

similar to it, the secret combinations can force everyone to be loyal to the New

World Order and its master, Satan.

On January 17, 1980, the President and Senate confirmed another

“Constitution,” namely, the “Constitution for the United Nations Industrial

Development Organization.” A perusal of this Foreign Constitution should more

than qualify the Internationalist’s intents. The “Preamble,” Article 1,

“Objectives” and Article 2, “Functions,” clearly evidences their intent to

direct, control, finance and subsidize all “…natural and human resources…”

and “…agro-related as well as basic industries…” through “…dynamic social

and economic changes…with a view to assisting in the establishment of a new

international economic order,” the high flown rhetoric obviously of “Communist”

origin and intents. An un-elected, unrepresentative, unaccountable oligarchy of

expatriates and aliens, who fraudulently claim in the Preamble that they intend

to establish “…rational and equitable international economic relations…yet

openly declared that they no longer “…stabilize the value of the dollar…” nor

“…assure the value of the coin and currency of the United States…” is purely

misrepresentation, deceit and fraud. This was augmented by Public Law 101-167,

103 Stat. 1995, which discloses massive appropriations of re-hypothecated debt

credit; for the general welfare and common defense of other Foreign Powers,

including “Communist” countries or satellites, International control of natural

and “human resources,” etc., etc.

A “Resource” is a claim of “property” and when related to people constitutes


It is now necessary to ask which Constitution they are operating under.

The “Constitution for the New states of the United States”, which was located at

Liberty Lobby, 300 Independence Ave., SE Washington, D.C. 20003, was the subject

matter of the book entitled “The Emerging Constitution” by Rexford G. Tugwell,

which was accomplished under the auspices of the Rockefeller tax-exempt

Page 53


foundation called the “Center for The Study of Democratic Institutions.” The

People and Citizens of this Nation were forewarned against formation of

“Democracies.” “Democracies” have ever been the spectacles of turbulence and

contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the

rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have

been violent in their deaths.” This alien Constitution, however, has nothing to

do with democracy. In reality, it is the basis of and for a despotic, tyrannical


Article I, “Rights and Responsibilities,” Sections 1 & 15 of this new

Constitution evidence their knowledge of the contrived “emergency.” The Rights

of expression, communication, movement, assembly, petition and Habeas Corpus are

all exempted from being exercised under and in a “declared emergency.” The

Constitution for the New states of America, openly declares, among other

seditious things and delusions, that:

“Until each indicated change in the government shall have been completed, the

provisions of the existing Constitution and the organs of government shall be in

effect. All operations of the national government shall cease as they are

replaced by those authorized under this Constitution.”

This is apparently what Burger was promoting in 1976, after he resigned

as Supreme Court Justice and took up the promotion of a “Constitutional

Convention.” No trial by jury is mentioned; “Just” compensation has been

removed; along with being informed of the “Nature and Cause of the Accusation,”

etc., etc.; and every one will of course participate in the “democracy.” This

constitution is but a reiteration of the Communist Doctrines, intents and

purposes, and clearly establishes a “Police Power” State, under direction and

control of a self appointed oligarchy.

Apparently the present operation of the “de facto” government is under

Foreign/Alien Constitutions, Laws, Rules and Regulations. The overthrow of the

“essential engine” declared in and by the ordained and established Constitution

for the United States of America (1787), and by and under the “Bill of Rights”

(1791) is obvious. The covert procedure used to implement and enforce these

Foreign Constitutions, Laws, Procedures, Rules, Regulations, etc., has not, to my

knowledge, been collected and assimilated nor presented as evidence to establish

seditious collusion and conspiracy.

Our patience and tolerance for those who pervert the very necessary and

basic foundations of society has been pushed to insufferable levels. They have

“fundamentally” changed the form and substance of the de jure Republican form of

Government; exhibited a willful and wanton disregard for the Rights, Safety and

Property of others; advanced a despotic design to reduce my people to slavery,

peonage and involuntary servitude, under a fraudulent, tyrannical, seditious

foreign oligarchy, with intent and purpose to institute and erect a

“Dictatorship” over the Citizens and their Posterity. They have completely

debauched the de jure monetary system; destroyed the livelihood and lives of

thousands; aided and abetted our enemies; declared war upon us and our Posterity;

destroyed untold families and made homeless over 750,000 children in the middle

of winter; afflicted widows and orphans; turned Sodomites lose amongst our young;

implemented foreign laws, rules, regulations and procedures within the body of

the country; incited insurrection, rebellion, sedition and anarchy within the de

jure society; illegally entered our Land; taken false Oaths; entered into

Seditious Foreign Constitutions, Agreements, Pacts, Confederations and Alliances;

and under pretense of “emergency,” which they themselves created, promoted,

furthered, and formed a multitude of offices and retained those of alien

allegiance to perpetuate their frauds and to eat out the substance of the good

and productive people of our Land; have arbitrarily dismissed and held mock

trials for those who trespassed upon our Lives, Liberties, Properties and

Families; and endangered our Peace, Safety, Welfare and Dignity. The damage,

injury and costs have been higher than mere money can repay. They have done what

they were COMMANDED NOT TO DO. They have taken from us our stewardship. It is

time to exercise our responsibility and retake our stewardship. It is time for

just correction.

One cannot make agreements with Sodomites, Babylonians and/or Satanists.

Their words, oaths or signatures are of no meaning or value; their intent and

Page 54


purpose is to deceive, cheat, steal, lie, defraud and destroy. The seditious

covert conspiracy and collusion of certain Organizations, Corporations and

Associations to damage, injure, oppress, threaten, intimidate and enforce their

fraudulent, foreign, socialist, Communist “Democracy” and foist their delusions

upon the Citizens and children of this Land; and to corrupt the de jure Public

Offices established to accomplish the purposes set forth in the “Preamble” to the

ordained and established Constitution is cause and necessity enough.

Once again finding our safety, happiness and liberties to be in imminent

danger, it has become necessary and imperative to our rights, privileges,

immunities, lives, liberties and property and that of our posterity, to declare

our separate and equal station, and exercise our Right and Duty to throw off and

abolish the form and operation of the de facto, fraudulent, seditious “state.”

Throughout time, patriots have always born the responsibility of

maintaining the vigilance that has kept freedom alive. This vigilance is rarely

comfortable and more often can be hazardous to one’s health. In such efforts it

is always necessary for those who have made these personal choices to affirm

their decisions with action. Have you ever wondered what happened to the men who

signed the Declaration of Independence?

Five signers were captured by the British as traitors and tortured before

they died. Twelve had their homes ransacked and burned. Two lost their sons in

the Revolutionary Army. Another had two sons captured. Nine of the 56 fought

and died from wounds or the hardships of the Revolutionary War.

What kind of men were they? Twenty-four were lawyers and jurists, eleven

were merchants, nine were farmers and large plantation owners, men of means, well

educated. But they signed the Declaration of Independence knowing full well that

the penalty would be death if they were captured.

Carter Braxton of Virginia, a wealthy planter and trader, had his ships

swept from the seas by the British Navy. He sold his home and properties to pay

his debts, and died in rags.

Thomas McKeam was so hounded by the British that he was forced to move

his family almost constantly. He served in the Congress without pay, while his

family was kept in hiding. His possessions were taken from him, and poverty was

his reward.

Vandals or soldiers or both, looted the properties of Ellery, Clymer,

Hall, Walton, Gwinnett, Heyward, Ruttledge and Middleton.

At the Battle of Yorktown, Thomas Nelson Jr. noted that the British

General Cornwallis had taken over the Nelson home for his headquarters. The

owner quietly urged General George Washington to open fire, which was done. The

home was destroyed, and Nelson died bankrupt.

Francis Lewis had his home and properties destroyed. The enemy jailed his wife,

and she died within a few months.

John Hart was driven from his wife’s bedside as she was dying. Their 13

children fled for their lives. His fields and his gristmill were laid waste.

For more than a year he lived in forests and caves, returning home after the war

to find his wife dead, and his children vanished. A few weeks later he died from

exhaustion and a broken heart.

Norris and Livingston suffered similar fates.

Such were the stories and sacrifices of the American Revolution. These

were not wild-eyed, rabble-rousing ruffians. They were soft-spoken men of means

and education. They had security, but they valued liberty more. Standing tall,

straight and unwavering they pledged: “For the support of this declaration, with

a firm reliance on the protection of the Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to

each other, our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.”

These men sacrificed to give us an independent America. Will our actions

prove us worthy to keep it? We are urged to study the Declaration of

Independence and the Constitution for the united states of America. How can we

Page 55


keep our freedom if we do not know and understand the laws that were the basis

for the existence of America, the greatest county that ever existed?

General Dwight D. Eisenhower said:

“A soldier’s pack is a much lighter burden than a slave’s


Every generation must pay the price of freedom. This is not a new


Mark Twain said:

“In the beginning of a change, the patriot is a scarce man and brave, hated and

scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him for then it costs

nothing to be a patriot.”

I am not preaching an affirmation of action as being a revolution of

violence. My action has been, as witnessed by exhibits included herein, to work

through the present legal systems and reverse the course to return us to the

Constitutional foundation, where we should be. I would only ask that the current

regime honor their own law. I am not realistically expecting to turn the tide,

but am aware of the responsibility and stewardship I have to be a peacekeeper and

to choose the right.

Our goal at this time is to restore the Constitution for the united

states of America with our freedoms, rights and the status of our true

Citizenship intact. We wish to do this as peacekeepers. We shall endeavor and

attempt to move Congress to declare that the national emergency is over and have

them reinstate the Constitution. We can then return this fictitious statutory

jurisdiction to its rightful cage within the District of Columbia. The residents

thereof may deal with it as they will. Out here in the Country, We the People,

the daughters and sons of the American Revolution will reclaim our unalienable

rights and live dealing fairly, openly and forthrightly with each other through

the well settled customs and usages of due process through the Common Law (God’s

Law). And this while always remembering to apply the Law within the restrictive

confines established for us by the Founders of our several State Constitutions,

that God Himself established. We cannot be saved in ignorance, nor can we be

ignorant of the workings of our government and remain a free people.

Mark E. Peterson said:

“To save the Constitution, either when it hangs by a thread or at any other time,

our people must be fully prepared. Part of the preparation is that they shall

understand the Constitution and be willing to accept the provisions set forth

therein. Nobody is going to risk very much to save an instrument, which he does

not understand, nor is he going to jeopardize his life or property to preserve

principles he does not accept. If some day the Elders of this Church will step

forth and save the Constitution, then the Elders of this Church must be fully

conversant with the Constitution and be wholeheartedly converted to the high

principles of free government, which it embodies. Are we thus converted? Are we

thus prepared?”

To achieve this goal we must educate as many people as possible. This means

getting them involved before it is too late. Johann W. Von Goethe (1749-1832)


“None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.”

In the end, we will win the war against Satan and his hosts, but not by

laying down and saying “…all is well in Zion.”

The Supreme Court said:

“It is not the function of the government to keep the Citizen from falling into

error; it is the function of the Citizen to keep the government from falling into


The corresponding responsibility falls on the shoulders of the Church

Page 56


members to be sure that the he or she is following the correct council from

Church leaders. At Brigham Young University, Harold B. Lee said:

“And that which doth not edify is not of God and is darkness. That which is of

God is light; and he that receiveth light, and continueth in God, receiveth more

light; and that light groweth brighter and brighter until the perfect day. (D&C


Now here are some ways, which may be manifest in the war of deceit, only just to

throw out a few as I conclude.

Brigham Young said:

‘’Were your faith concentrated upon the proper object, your confidence unshaken,

your lives pure and holy, everyone fulfilling the duty of his or her calling

according to the priesthood and capacity bestowed upon you, you would be filled

with the Holy Ghost and it would be as impossible for man to be deceived, to

deceive and to lead you to destruction as for a feather to remain unconsumed in

the midst of intense heat.’ ““

And then there is his other powerful statement that will surprise some of you. He


‘I am more afraid that these people will have so much confidence in their

leaders that they will not inquire for themselves of God whether or not they are

being led by Him. I am fearful they settle down in a blind state of blind

security, trusting their eternal destiny in the hands of their leaders, with a

reckless confidence that in itself will thwart the purposes of God and their

salvation and weaken that influence they could give to their leaders if they

would know for themselves by the revelations of Jesus Christ that they are led in

the right way. Let every man and woman know by the whisperings of the Spirit of

God to themselves whether their leaders are walking in the right way the Lord

dictates or not.’

You see, that puts upon each of us the responsibility of finding out for

ourselves by the witness of the Spirit as we hear these instructions.”

I have always been taught to liken the scriptures unto ourselves. We

have been warned many times to put our trust in God and not in the arm of flesh.

No matter who speaks, if they do not speak with the power of the Holy Ghost, they

do not speak for the Lord. Any Elder who speaks by the power of the Holy Ghost

speaks for the Lord. There are certain rules the Lord follows and those inspired

by the Holy Ghost will follow those rules. The one inspired by the Holy Ghost

will not exceed the authority of his calling, however all have the responsibility

to cry repentance to those who have gone astray. Nothing can or should be done

without the approval of the Holy Ghost. We have examples in the scriptures along

with the words of the modern prophets to use as a guide.

Brother George Q. Cannon shares the following warning with us:

“Do not, brother, put your trust in man though he be a Bishop, an apostle or a

president; if you do, they will fail you at some time or place, they will do

wrong or seem to, and your support be gone; but if we lean on God, He never will

fail us. When men and women depend on God alone, and trust Him alone, their

faith will not be shaken if the highest in the Church should step aside. They

could still see that He is just and true, that truth is lovely in His sight, and

the pure in heart are dear to Him.

Perhaps it is His own design that faults and weaknesses should appear in high

places in order that His Saints may learn to trust in Him and not in any man or


Ezra Taft Benson made the following comment:

“Six of the original Twelve Apostles selected by Joseph Smith were

excommunicated. The three Witnesses to the Book of Mormon left the Church.

Three of Joseph Smith’s counselors fell — one even helped plot his death. A

Natural question that might arise would be that, if the Lord knew in advance that

Page 57


these men would fall, as He undoubtedly did, why did He have His prophet call

them to such high office: The answer is, to fill the Lord’s purposes. For even

the Master followed the will of the Father by selecting Judas. President George

Q. Cannon suggested an explanation, too, when he stated, ‘Perhaps it is His own

design that faults and weaknesses should appear in high places in order that His

Saints may learn to trust Him and not in any man or men.’ And this would

parallel Nephi’s warning, put not your ‘trust in the arm of flesh.'” (2 Nephi


Every man and woman has the responsibility to know for themselves if

their leaders are leading them in the right direction. This means that every man

and woman must understand the Standard Works and the Constitution, which secure

their spiritual and temporal free agency, and learn to apply their principles

while staying tuned to the Holy Ghost for it is by a combination of these things

that we can tell if our leaders are leading us in the right direction. The

Brethren would not have warned us of putting too much confidence in our leaders

if it were impossible for our leaders to make mistakes.

Men often supposed they have authority that has never been granted them.

We make the mistake of assuming these men, with their supposed authority,

actually have been granted their authority, and thereby they are able to impose

their will upon us. The 121st section of the D&C verse 39 states that:

“We have learned by sad experience that it is the nature and

disposition of almost all men, as soon as they get a little authority, as they

suppose, they will immediately begin to exercise un-righteous dominion.”

A real clue to this passage is to look up ‘suppose’ in the dictionary in

use in Joseph Smith’s time. Noah Webster’s 1828 edition of the American

Dictionary of the English Language shows: Suppose v. 1.) To lay down or state as

a proposition or fact that may exist or be true or to exist; or to imagine or

admit to exist, for the sake of argument or illustration. 5.) To put one thing

by fraud in the place of another. Suppose n., Supposition; position without


And in truth, in more than one time in history, it only took a few

unrighteous men to lead the Church down the primrose path to destruction. Ezra

Taft Benson says:

“These, then, are the three tests: The Standard Works, the inspired words of the

Presidents of the Church, particularly the living prophets, and the promptings of

the Holy Ghost.”

Some people will not want to hear of these things and may attempt to

refute the conclusions supported by the evidence expounded in this letter. To

refute this letter they must simply refute the Scriptures, Case Law, Codes and

Congressional Record that have been enacted as referenced to herein. We all have

a responsibility to warn our neighbor. These things I share with you as a

warning. You, too, are now responsible for what you have learned.

I do not challenge anyone’s right to choose the jurisdiction in which

they wish to live. I have declared the jurisdiction in which my conscience will

permit me to live. This is my truly and sincerely held belief of conscience, and

I stand on the fact that such a choice is my birthright, guaranteed by the

Constitution, by the hand of God, and not as the result of the tolerance granted

as a privilege by a secret combination. Rights, especially birthrights, come to

Americans because of the blessings of Divine Providence, not because of an

accident, or out of ignorance. And as any honest man will admit, with rights

come responsibilities. In my case, these responsibilities weigh heavy on my

heart. My conscience will not allow me to do other than what I have been

persuaded by the Holy Ghost to stand upon. And as you can see, if you have made

the effort to wade through all of this revelation of knowledge in the published

authorities made available to me, this is no small revelation. We often see

others as being “…steeped in the traditions of their fathers.” Do we now have

the courage to accept truth in the form in which we find it? Do we have the

courage to act upon it? Are we willing to stand and declare our selves as Joshua


Page 58


The basic laws and principles of the Gospel never change. They don’t

change because our Father in Heaven does not change. The Scriptures are here to

give us an example of these laws and principles. It is our intimate knowledge of

these laws and principles and the obedience to, and following of these laws that

prepares us to become Gods. It is a requirement of Godhood that we are able to

always recognize truth and have the self-discipline to follow that truth even

when others do not see it or follow it. There is a reward for every action. We

receive our reward from whom we serve. The scriptures are an account of those

who served God and those who served Mammon. Those who pattern themselves after

those who served God will receive their reward from God. Those who do the things

described as evil will receive their reward from Satan.

“For every man receiveth wages of him whom he listeth to obey, and this according

to the words of the spirit of prophecy; therefore let it be according to the


Samuel Adams and his wife Abigail were two of the most virtuous people in

colonial America at the time King George had sent hither swarms of officers to

harass our people and to eat out their substance. Samuel Adams became an

ambassador, a domestic, public servant in many ways, but most importantly of all,

he was the man who, in all the history of American statesmanship, was the only

one qualified to step into the shoes of the Grandfather of the American

Republics: George Washington.

Yet before he knew the flush of success and the weight of responsibility

born of the vindication, which came with our victories against the English

tyrants, he too had a battle with his conscience. Fair weather patriots had

frittered away many opportunities to stand for what was right because they

counted the cost and had decided to “…enjoy the pleasures of Egypt for a

season.” These were not his enemies, but many of them were sincerely misguided

and terribly shortsighted about the consequences of compromise with a monster

like the 18th century English Crown. His dilemma was not unusual. How was he to

stand for the right while mired down in the midst of those who would flirt with

the tyrant’s dragon? This was his final word to them on this touchiest of


“If ye love wealth better than liberty;

the tranquility of servitude

better than the animating contest for freedom;

Go home from us in peace.

We ask not your counsels nor arms.

Crouch down and lick the hands that feed you.

May your chains rest lightly upon you,

and may Posterity forget that ye were our Countrymen.”

Samuel Adams, speech at the Philadelphia State House,

August 1, 1776.

I pray that we all can develop such profound zeal for the precious

endowments of liberty and freedom that were vicariously given to us. It was

necessary to establish this cradle of liberty before the restoration of the

gospel, and thus the second coming could be accomplished.

May He keep us all in His tender mercies,


Written by lovinight

March 13, 2013 at 6:11 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

Tagged with , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: